Substantive equality revisited

Available in Russian

Available for free

Author: Sandra Fredman

DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2017-1-37-63

Keywords: discrimination; substantive equality; неравенство; позитивные действия; сглаживание различий; структурные изменения


The limitations of a formal interpretation of the right to equality are now well recognized. However, the meaning of substantive equality remains deeply contested. Some of scholars think that equality is an idea that should be banished from moral and legal discourse as an explanatory norm. Another part of the learned community holds that the right to equality does not go far enough. Even if equality before the law has been established, disadvantage persists, and this disadvantage tends to be concentrated in groups with a particular status, such as women, people with disabilities, ethnic minorities and others. This article argues that the right to substantive equality should not be collapsed into a single formula, such as dignity, or equality of opportunity or results. Instead, drawing on familiar conceptions, a four-dimensional approach is proposed: to redress disadvantage; address stigma, stereotyping, prejudice, and violence; enhance voice and participation; and accommodate difference and achieve structural change. This reflects the principle that the right to equality should be responsive to those who are disadvantaged, demeaned, excluded, or ignored. The four-dimensional approach is deliberately framed in terms of dimensions, to permit us to focus on their interaction and synergies, rather than asserting a pre-established lexical priority. Drawing attention to all the dimensions and insisting on building complementarities can move us positively towards furthering substantive equality. Conflicts should be addressed by referring to the whole framework, to create a synthesis rather than prioritizing. It is thus not a definition, but an analytic framework to assess and assist in modifying laws, policies and practices to better achieve substantive equality.

About the author: Sandra Fredman – Rhodes Professor of the Laws of the British Commonwealth and the USA, Oxford University; Professorial Fellow of Pembroke College, Oxford; Director, Oxford Human Rights Hub, United Kingdom.

Citation: Fredman S. (2017) Vozvrashchayas’ k voprosu o soderzhatel’nom ravenstve [Substantive equality revisited]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.1, pp.37–63. (In Russian).


Albertyn C. (2007) Substantive Equality and Transformation in South. South African Journal of Human Rights, vol.23, no.2, pp.253–276.

Albertyn C., Goldblatt B. (1998) Facing the Challenge of Transformation: Difficulties in the Development of an Indigenous Jurisprudence on Equality. South African Journal on Human Rights, vol.14, no.2, pp.248–276.

Barnard C. (2004) The Future of Equality Law: Equality and Beyond. In: Barnard C., Deakin S., Morris G.S. (eds.) The Future of Labour Law: Liber Amicorum Bob Hepple QC, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp.213–228.

Brodsky G., Day S. (2002) Beyond the Social and Economic Rights Debate: Substantive Equality Speaks to Poverty. Canadian Journal Women and the Law, vol.14, no.1, pp.185–220.

Chant S. (2006) Re-thinking the “Feminization of Poverty” in Relation to Aggregate Gender Indices. Journal of Human Development, vol.7. no.2, pp.201–220.

Chant S. (2008) The “Feminisation of Poverty” and the “Feminisation” of Anti-Poverty Programmes: Room for Revision? Journal of Development Studies, vol.44, no.2, pp.165–197.

Collins H. (2003) Discrimination, Equality and Social Inclusion. Modern Law Review, vol.66, no.1, pp.16–43.

Day S., Brodsky G. (1996) The Duty to Accommodate: Who Will Benefit? Canadian Bar Review, vol.75, no.3, pp.433–473.

Ely J.H. (1980) Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Feldman D. (1999) Human Dignity as a Legal Value: Part 1. Public Law, vol.44, pp.682–702.

Fraser N., Honneth A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London; New York: Verso.

Fredman S. (1994) A Difference with Distinction: Pregnancy and Parenthood Reassessed. Law Quarterly Review, vol.110, no.1, pp.106–123.

Fredman S. (1997) Women and the Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.

Fredman S. (2002) The Future of Equality in Britain: EOC Working Paper No.5, Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.

Fredman S. (2006) From Deference to Democracy: the Role of Equality under the Human Rights Act 1998. Law Quarterly Review, vol.122, no.1, pp.53–81.

Fredman S. (2007) Redistribution and Recognition: Reconciling Inequalities. South African Journal on Human Rights, vol.23, no.2, pp.214–234.

Fredman S. (2011) Discrimination Law, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Fredman S. (2014) Engendering Social Welfare Rights. In: Goldblatt B., Lamarche L. (eds.) Women’s Right to Social Security and Social Protection, Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp.19–39.

Fredman S., Spencer S. (2006) Beyond Discrimination: It’s Time for Enforceable Duties on Public Bodies to Promote Equality Outcomes. European Human Rights Law Review, no.6. pp.598–606.

Fudge J. (2007) Substantive Equality, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Limits to Redistribution. South African Journal on Human Rights, vol.23, no.2, pp.235–252.

Gardner J. (1989) Liberals and Unlawful Discrimination. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol.9, no.1, pp.1–22.

Hennette-Vauchez S. (2011) A Human Dignitas? Remnants of the Ancient Legal Concept in Contemporary Dignity Jurisprudence. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.9, no.1, pp.32–57.

Hepple B. (1990) Discrimination and Equality of Opportunity – Northern Irish Lessons. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol.10, no.3, pp.408–421.

Hepple B. (2011) Equality: The New Legal Framework, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.

Kelman M. (2001) Market Discrimination and Groups. Stanford Law Review, vol.53, no.4, pp.833–896.

Lister R. (2004) Poverty, Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.

MacKinnon С. (1987) Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

MacKinnon С. (1991) Reflections on Sex Equality under Law. Yale Law Journal, vol.100, no.5, pp.1281–1328.

MacKinnon С. (2012) Gender in Constitutions. In: Rosenfeld M., Sajó A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.397–418.

McCrudden C. (2008) Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, vol.19, no.4, pp.655–724.

Midgley J. (2008) et al. Welfare Reform in the United States: Implications for British Social Policy: CASEpaper 131, London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.

Minow M. (2010) In Brown’s Wake: Legacies of America’s Educational Landmark. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Nussbaum M. (2000) Women and Human Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Parekh B. (1998) Integrating Minorities. In: Blackstone T., Parekh B.C., Sanders P. (eds.) Race Relations in Britain: A Developing Agenda, London: Routledge pp.1–21.

Parfit D. (1997) Equality and Priority. Ratio, vol.10, no.3, pp.202–221.

Porter B. (2007) Claiming Adjudicative Space: Social Rights, Equality and Citizenship. In: Young M., Boyd S.B., Brodsky G., Day S. (eds.) Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship and Legal Activism, Vancouver: UBC Press, pp.77–95.

Raz J. (2009) On the Value of Distributional Equality. In: De Wijze S., Kramer M.H., Carter I. (eds.) Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges, NewYork: Routledge, pp.22–33.

Réaume D.G. (2003) Discrimination and Dignity. Louisiana Law Review, vol.63, no.3, pp.645–695.

Rubio Marin R. (2012) A New European Parity-Democracy Sex Equality Model and Why it Won’t Fly in the United States. American Journal of Comparative Law, vol.60, no.1, pp.99–125.

Sen A. (1992) Inequality Re-examined, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sen A. (1999) Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Siegal R. (2011) From Colorblindness to Antibalkanization: An Emerging Ground of Decision in Race Equality Cases. Yale Law Journal, vol.120, no.6, pp.1278–1366.

Storey P., Chamberlin R. (2001) Improving the Take Up of Free School Meals: Research Report No.270, Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education. Available at: (accessed: 07.02.2017).

Westen P. (1982) The Empty Idea of Equality. Harvard Law Review, vol.95, no.3, pp.537–596.

Williams B. (1962) The Idea of Equality. In: Laslett P., Runciman W.G. (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society. Second Series, Oxford: Basil Blackwell; pp.110–131.

Young I. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.