Available in Russian
Author: Renáta Uitz
Keywords: advisory referendum; constitutional reforms; illiberal democracy; national cooperation; traditionalism
This article provides a critical analysis of several aspects of constitutional development in Hungary since 2010. In that period of time, the new constitution of the country, called the Fundamental (Basic) Law, was worked out and adopted. This act is a flexible constitution: it can be amended by a majority of two thirds of members of the Hungarian parliament. In combination with the fact that the ruling coalition led by Fidesz has had a necessary majority during two of the last three legislatures, this has allowed for a repeated amending of the young constitution. The cause for this phenomenon is rooted in the specific style of shaping the legal framework, implying that steps and ideas intended by the political program of the government led by prime minister Viktor Orbán are to be written down precisely in the rules of the constitution and parliamentary laws. The outline of this program is provided by the so called Declaration of National Cooperation, whose use helps us to better understand the design as well as the substance of the constitutional changes. Both the government and observers, including those that are critically minded, use the term “revolution” in order to describe the current changes, though with a slightly different meaning. However, all actors share the opinion of the far-reaching character of the current transformation taken by its absolute value. Among particular subjects, covered in the article, the so called National Consultation, a kind of advisory referendum, deserves special attention. The author of the article considers this institute critically as a method merely to create a legitimating background for governmental reforms and not connected with an intent to explore the real will of the people.
About the author: Renáta Uitz – Professor, Chair of the Comparative Constitutional Law Program, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.
Citation: Uitz R. (2019) Izobretenie novoy Vengrii v pylu revolyutsii: Deklaratsiya natsional’nogo sotrudnichestva kak rukovodstvo dlya chitatelya po Osnovnomu zakonu 2011 goda [Reinventing Hungary with Revolutionary Fervor: The Declaration of National Cooperation as a Reader’s Guide to the Fundamental Law of 2011]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 28, no. 1, pp.42–60. (In Russian).
Arató A. (2010) Post-Sovereign Constitution-making in Hungary: After Success, Partial Failure, and Now What? South African Journal of Human Rights, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 19–44.
Bánkuti M., Halmai G., Scheppele K. L. (2012) Disabling the Fundamental Law. Journal of Democracy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 138–146.
Batory Á. (2014) Uploading as Political Strategy: The European Parliament and the Hungarian Media Law Debate. East European Politics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 230–245.
Batory Á. (2016) Populists in Government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation”. Democratization, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 283–303.
Elkins Z., Ginsburg T., Melton J. (2014) The Content of Authoritarian Constitutions. In: Ginsburg T., Simpser A. (eds.) Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–164.
Enyedi Z. (2015) Plebeians, Citoyens and Aristocrats or Where is the Bottom of the Bottom? The Case of Hungary. In: Kriesi H., Pappas T. (eds.) Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 229–244.
Halmai G. (2012) From the “Rule of Law Revolution” to The Constitutional Counter-Revolution in Hungary. European Yearbook on Human Rights, 2012, pp. 367–384.
Halmai G. (2017) The Hungarian Constitutional Court and Constitutional Identity. 10 January. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/thehungarian-constitutional-court-and-constitutional-identity/ (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Krygier M. (2014) Transformations of the Rule of Law: Legal, Liberal and Neo: Paper presented at KJuris at Dickson Poon School of Law, KCL, 1 October.
Küpper H. (2012) Ungarns neues Grundgesetz von 2011: Kein Grund zum Jubel, aber auch noch nicht das Ende der Demokratie. Südosteuropa Mitteilungen, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 80–101.
Landau D. (2013) Abusive Constitutionalism. University of Californica Davis Law Review, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 189–260.
Law D., Versteeg M. (2013) Sham Constitutions. California Law Review, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 863–956.
Müller J.-W. (2013) Defending Democracy within the EU. Journal of Democracy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 138–149.
Müller J.-W. (2015) Should the EU Protect Democracy and the Rule of Law inside Member States? European Law Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 141–160.
Müller J.-W. (2018) Homo Orbanicus. New York Review of Books, 5 April.
Rév I. (2005) Retroactive Justice: The Pre-history of Post-Communism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Scheppele K. L. (2014) Hungary and the End of Politics How Victor Orbán launched a constitutional coup and created a one-party state. 6 May. Available at: https://www.thenation.com/article/hungary-and-endpolitics/ (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Simon Z. (2011) Hungary First to Write a Constitution on an iPad, Lawmaker Says. 4 March. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/ 2011-03-04/hungary-first-to-write-a-constitution-on-ipad-lawmakersays (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Sonnevend P., Jakab A., Csink L. (2015) The Constitution as an Instrument of Everyday Party Politics: The Basic Law of Hungary. In: Von Bogdandy A., Sonnevend P. (eds.) Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area, Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp. 46–123.
Tóth G. A. (ed.) (2012) Constitution for a Disunited Nation. On Hungary's 2011 Fundamental Law, Budapest: Central European University Press.
Trencsényi B. (2013) From Goulash Communism to Goulash Authoritarianism. Available at: http://www.iwm.at/read-listen-watch/transit-online/from-goulash-communism-to-goulash-authoritarianism/ (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Uitz R. (2014) Expelling Dissent: On Account of the ECtHR Judgment in Baka v. Hungary. 3 June. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/expelling-dissent-account-ecthr-judgment-baka-v-hungary-2/ (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Uitz R. (2016) Hungary’s Attempt to Manage Threats of Terror through a Constitutional Amendment. 28 April. Available at: http://www.constitutionnet.org/news/hungarys-attempt-manage-threats-terrorthrough-constitutional-amendment (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Uitz R. (2016) National Constitutional Identity in the European Constitutional Project: A Recipe for Exposing Cover Ups and Masquerades.11 November. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/national-constitutional-identity-in-the-european-constitutional-project-a-recipefor-exposing-cover-ups-and-masquerades/ (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Uitz R. (2017) The Return of the Sovereign: A Look at the Rule of Law in Hungary – and in Europe. 5 April. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/the-return-of-the-sovereign-a-look-at-the-rule-of-law-in-hungaryand-in-europe/ (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Uitz R. (2017) Academic Freedom in an Illiberal Democracy: From the Rule of Law Through Rule by Law to Rule by Men in Hungary. 15 October. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/academic-freedom-in-anilliberal-democracy-from-rule-of-law-through-rule-by-law-to-ruleby-men-in-hungary/ (accessed: 19.02.2019).
Vörös I. (2017) A ‘Constitutional Coup’ in Hungary Between 2010–2014. On Some Aspects of the Exclusive Systemic Exercise of State Power with Regard to Constitutional Law, International Law, and European Law. In: Magyar B., Vásárhelyi J. (eds.) Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State, Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 41–68.