Legal reforms as a tool of managing meanings in the Polish public sphere

Available in Russian

Price 180 Rub.

Author: Vasily Zagretdinov

DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2022-1-76-107

Keywords: populism; public sphere; management of meaning

Abstract

This study addresses patterns of Polish political and legal practice. The author deliberately avoids analyzing reforms of the judiciary and other institutions of power and focuses instead on reforms in the public sphere. The choice of Poland as an object of research is not accidental. Poland and Russia demonstrate a dialectical connection. On the one hand, Poland and Russia are on opposite sides of the newly drawn line of geopolitical confrontation. On the other hand, despite their rather intense political confrontation, Poland and Russia demonstrate many similarities in their practice of governance in the public space. At the same time, despite their dramatic shifts in geopolitical pathways, they ironically continue to play an important role in each other’s existence due to inextricable historical ties. At the same time, this study is not focused on the classic research topic of populism, which is traditionally investigated in reforms of judicial and quasi-judicial institutions. On the contrary, the author draws attention to reforms in the public sphere. These reforms, according to the author, are an indirect way of regulating society by a populist leader. At first glance, not all of the examples studied lie within the sphere of classical constitutional and legal regulation. However, they nevertheless relate to the sphere of social relations in regulation of governmental and social activities that constitute the realm of public affairs and ultimately are a subject of constitutional law. The article will follow the practices of managing meaning by reforms affecting public meetings, security (including extrajudicial collection of information), sex education, artificial termination of pregnancy, media control and national memory management. All of these means are employed by the Polish government to cement convenient public discourse. According to the author, the mechanisms used by the Polish authorities are no less effective from the point of view of state management. These methods are also more beneficial to the authorities themselves by virtue of their mediation they are less subject to critical evaluation, while retaining the possibility of subsequent formal control.

About the author: Vasily Zagretdinov – Ph.D. Candidate, MJur, MSc (LSE European Institute), Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Zagretdinov V. (2022) Konstitutsionno-pravovye reformy kak instrumenty upravleniya smyslami v publichnom prostranstve Pol'shi [Legal reforms as a tool of managing meanings in the Polish public sphere]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 76–107. (In Russian).

References

Arendt H. (2017) Vita Activa, ili O deyatel'noy zhizni [Vita Activa, or On active life], V.V.Bibikhin (transl.), Moscow: Ad Marginem. (In Russian).

Atnashev T., Velizhev M., Vayzer T. (2021) Dvesti let opyta: ot burzhuaznoy publichnoy sfery k rossiyskim rezhimam publichnosti [Two hundred years of experience: from the bourgeois public sphere to Russian regimes of publicity]. In: Atnashev T., Vayzer T., Velizhev M. (eds.) Nesovershennaya publichnaya sfera. Istoriya rezhimov publichnosti v Rossii [Imperfect public sphere. History of publicity regimes in Russia], Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, pp. 5–81. (In Russian).

Avak'yan S.A. (2014) Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. Uchebnyy kurs: uchebnoe posobie. Tom 1 [Constitutional law of Russia. Training course: a textbook. vol. 1], in 2 vols., Moscow: Norma. (In Russian).

Baunov A. (2015) Not Against Russia: Why the Eastern Partnership Makes Increasingly Less Sense. 1 June. Available at: https://carnegiemoscow.org/commentary/60256 (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Bayer L. (2017) Poland and Hungary Stand United (Except on Russia). Politico, 22 September. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-hungary-stand-united-except-on-russia-orban-szydlo/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Bernatt M., Ziółkowski M. (2019) Statutory Anti-Constitutionalism. Washington International Law Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 487–526.

Bodalska B. (2018) Prezydent podpisał ustawę o IPN i skierował ją do TK. Euractiv, 7 February. Available at: https://www.euractiv.pl/section/demokracja/news/47826/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Bohman J., Rehg W. (eds.) (1997) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brouwer E. (2018) Schengen Entry Bans for Political Reasons? The Case of Lyudmyla Kozlovska. Verfassungsblog, 30 August. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/schengen-entry-bans-for-political-reasons-the-case-of-lyudmyla-kozlovska/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Burnetko K. (2016) Macierewicz wbrew powstańcom przeforsował apel smoleński. To cyniczne kupczenie pamięcią. Polityka, 25 July. Available at: https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/kraj/1669818,1,macierewicz-wbrew-powstancom-przeforsowal-apel-smolenski-to-cyniczne-kupczenie-pamiecia.read (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Buzan B., Wæver O., de Wilde J. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder; London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Chabasiński R. (2019) Ustawa “stop pedofilii” to ostatni bubel prawny tej kadencji Sejmu – i być może pierwszy następnej chabasiński. Bezprawnik, 16 October. Available at: https://bezprawnik.pl/stop-pedofilii-bubel-prawny/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Chapman A. (2017) Pluralism under Attack: The Assault on Press Freedom in Poland. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_Poland_Report_Final_2017.pdf (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Chmielarz-Grochal A., Sułkowski J. (2018) Appointment of Judges to the Constitutional Tribunal in 2015 as the Trigger Point for a Deep Constitutional Crisis in Poland. Przegląd Konstytucyjny, no. 2, pp. 91–119.

Cienski J. (2020) Poland’s Duda Goes to War Against Foreign Media. Politico, 7 July. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-election-2020-president-andrzej-duda-goes-to-war-against-foreign-media/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Ciensky J. (2016) Poland’s “Powerholic”. Politico, 8 July. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/polands-powerholic-jaroslaw-kaczynski-warsaw-law-and-justice-party-pis/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Ciensky J. (2015) The King of Poland. Politico, 27 October. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-elections-kaczynski-tusk-duda-smolensk/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Coleman S., Przybylska A., Sintomer Y. (2015) Deliberation and Democracy: Innovative Processes and Institutions, New York: Peter Lang.

Deák I., Gross J.T., Judt T. (2000) The Politics of Retribution in Europe: World War II and Its Aftermath, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Drinóczi T., Bień-Kacała A. (2017) Illiberal Constitutionalism in Hungary and Poland: The Case of Judicialization of Politics. In: Bień-Kacała A., Csink L., Milej T., Serowaniec M. (eds.) Liberal Constitutionalism – Between Individual and Collective Interests, Toruń: Wydział Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, pp. 73–108.

Dudina G. (2018) Kakie pamyatniki planiruyut snesti v Pol'she [What monuments are planned to be demolished in Poland]. Kommersant, 6 July. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3677421 (accessed: 06.02.2022). (In Russian).

Ehl М. (2017) The Secrets of Jarosław Kaczyński. Aspen Review, 15 March. Available at: https://www.aspen.review/article/2017/the-secrets-of-jaroslaw-kaczynski/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Fiala C., Arthur J.H. (2017) There Is No Defence for “Conscientious Objection” in Reproductive Health Care. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 216, pp. 254–258.

Florczak-Wątor M. (2017) Glosa do wyroku TK z dnia 16 marca 2017 r., sygn. akt Kp 1/17. Konstytucyjny.pl, 17 September. Available at: https://konstytucyjny.pl/glosa-do-wyroku-tk-z-dnia-16-marca-2017-r-sygn-akt-kp-117-monika-florczak-wator/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Foy H. (2016) Jaroslaw Kaczynski: Poland’s Kingmaker. Financial Times, 26 February. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/8238e15a-db46-11e5-a72f-1e7744c66818 (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Garlicki L. (2016) Die Ausschaltung des Verfassungsgerichtshofes in Polen? (Disabling the Constitutional Court in Poland?) In: Szmyt A., Banaszak B. (eds.) Transformation of Law Systems in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe in 1989–2015, Gdańsk: Gdańsk University Press, pp. 63–79.

Gliszczyńska-Grabias A. (2018) Law and Memory. Visegrad Insight, 14 February. Available at: https://visegradinsight.eu/law-and-memory/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Graber M.A., Levinson S., Tushnet M. (eds.) (2018) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grzelak A. (2018) Choosing Between Two Evils: The Polish Ombudsman’s Dilemma. Verfassungsblog, 6 May. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/choosing-between-two-evils-the-polish-ombudsmans-dilemma/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Habermas J. (2016) Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoy sfery: issledovaniya otnositel'no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva [Structural change in the public sphere: Studies on the category of bourgeois society], V.V.Ivanov (transl.), Moscow: Ves' mir. (In Russian).

Henderson K. (2005) Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union, London; New York: Routledge.

Hirschl R. (2000) The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions. Law & Social Inquiry, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 91–149.

Honig B. (2009) Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kaczmarczyk М. (2013) Transformatsiya mediasistemy v Pol'she posle 1989 g. [Media system transformation in Poland after 1989]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 13, pp. 195–206. (In Russian).

Kenenova I. (2018) Konstitutsionalizm i politicheskoe liderstvo v stranakh Tsentral'noy i Vostochnoy Evropy: problemy i perspektivy [Constitutionalism and political leadership in Central and Eastern European countries: challenges and perspectives]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 11–41. (In Russian).

Koncewicz T.T. (2018) “Existential Judicial Review” in Retrospect, “Subversive Jurisprudence” in Prospect. The Polish Constitutional Court Then, Now and… Tomorrow. Verfassungsblog, 7 October. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/existential-judicial-review-in-retrospect-subversive-jurisprudence-in-prospect-the-polish-constitutional-court-then-now-and-tomorrow/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Koncewicz T.T. (2018) Remembering as Pacting between Past, Present and Future. Verfassungsblog, 13 January. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/remembering-as-pacting-between-past-present-and-future/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Koncewicz T.T. (2018) The Capture of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and Beyond: Of Institution(s), Fidelities and the Rule of Law in Flux. Review of Central and East European Law, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 116–173.

Kość W. (2021) Poland’s Duda Looks to Avert US Clash by Vetoing Media Law. Politico, 27 December. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-duda-us-clash-media-law-veto/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Krastev I. (2016) The Specter Haunting Europe: The Unraveling of the Post-1989 Order. Journal of Democracy, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 88–98.

Krzymowski M. (2015) Jarosław. Tajemnice Kaczyńskiego, Warszawa: Ringier Axel Springer Polska.

Łętowska E., Wiewiórowska-Domagalska A. (2016) A “Good” Change in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal? Osteuropa Recht, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 79–93.

Lyotard J.-F. (1998) Sostoyanie postmoderna [The postmodern condition], N.A.Shmako (transl.), Saint-Petersburg: Aleteyya. (In Russian).

Loth W. (1988) The Division of the World, 1941–1955, London: Routledge.

Luxmoore M. (2018) Poles Apart: The Bitter Conflict Over a Nation’s Communist History. The Guardian, 2018. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/jul/13/poles-apart-the-bitter-conflict-over-a-nations-history-poland-monuments-communism-soviet-union?CMP=share_btn_tw (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Maslovskiy M.V. (2020) Interpretatsii modernosti i konservativnye politicheskie elity v Tsentral'noy i Vostochnoy Evrope [Interpretations of modernity and conservative political elites in Central and Eastern Europe]. Vlast' i elity, no. 2, pp. 5–21. (In Russian).

Medushevskiy A.N. (2018) Populizm i konstitutsionnaya transformatsiya: Vostochnaya Evropa, postsovetskoe prostranstvo i Rossiya [Populism and constitutional transformation: Eastern Europe, post-soviet space and Russia]. Zhurnal politicheskoy filosofii i sotsiologii politiki “Politiya. Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz”, no. 3, pp. 113–139. (In Russian).

Medushevsky A. (2018) Konstitutsionnaya retraditsionalizatsiya v Vostochnoy Evrope i Rossii [Constitutional re-traditionalization in Eastern Europe and Russia]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 13–32. (In Russian).

Mikołajczyk S. (2017) The Rape of Poland: Pattern of Soviet Aggression, Chicago, IL: Arcole Publishing.

Parau C.E. (2018) Transnational Networking and Elite Self-Empowerment. The Making of the Judiciary in Contemporary Europe and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Przybylski W. (2018) Explaining Eastern Europe: Can Poland’s Backsliding Be Stopped? Journal of Democracy, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 52–64.

Puddington A. (2017) Breaking Down Democracy: Goals, Strategies, and Methods of Modern Authoritarians. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/June2017_FH_Report_Breaking_Down_Democracy.pdf (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Radziewicz P. (2017) On Legal Consequences of Judgements of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal Passed by an Irregular Panel. Review of Comparative Law, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 45–64.

Sadurski W. (2018) How Democracy Dies (in Poland): A Case-Study of Anti-Constitutional Populist Backsliding. Sydney Law School Research Paper no. 18/01. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3103491 (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Sadurski W. (2019) Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sadurski W. (2019) Polish Constitutional Tribunal under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler. Hague Journal of the Rule of Law, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–84.

Shekhovtsov A. (2015) Far-Right Election Observation Monitors in the Service of the Kremlin’s Foreign Policy. In: Laruelle M. (ed.) Eurasianism and the European Far Right: Reshaping the Europe-Russia Relationship, Lanham: Lexington Books, pp. 223–243.

Shmitt C. (2016) Ponyatie politicheskogo [The concept of the political], A.F.Filippov (transl.), Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka. (In Russian).

Skerpan A.A. (1950) The Rape of Poland: The Pattern of Soviet Aggression by Stanislaw Mikołajczyk; The Struggle behind the Iron Curtain by Ferenc Nagy, Stephen K. Swift. The Russian Review, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–62.

Sokuler Z.A. (1994) Lyudvig Vitgenshteyn i ego mesto v filosofii XX v.: kurs lektsiy [Ludwig Wittgenstein and his place in the philosophy of the XX century: lecture course], Dolgoprudnyy: Allegro-Press. (In Russian).

Terekhov A. (2009) Vladimir Chizhov: “Yuzhnyy potok” nado sdelat' prioritetnym proektom ES [Vladimir Chizhov: “South Stream” should be made a priority project of the EU]. Nezavisimaya gazeta, 18 May. Available at: https://www.ng.ru/courier/2009-05-18/9_chizhov.html?mright=0 (accessed: 06.02.2022). (In Russian).

Tilles D. (2021) Smolensk Crash May Never be Explained, Says Kaczyński. Notes from Poland, 7 April. Available at: https://notesfrompoland.com/2021/04/07/smolensk-crash-may-never-be-explained-says-kaczynski/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Wanat Z. (2021) Poland’s Ruling Party Rams Through Media Law Despite US Warnings. Politico, 12 August. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/polands-pis-rams-through-media-law-despite-us-warnings/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

Webber M. (2020) Poland to Move to Limit Foreign Media Soon, PiS Leader Says. Politico, 20 July. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/poland-to-limit-foreign-media-soon-pis-leader-says/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).

White J. (2015) Emergency Europe. Political Studies, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 300–318.

Wittgenstein L. (2005) Tractatus logico philosophicus [Tractatus logico philosophicus]. In: Wittgenstein L. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works], V.Rudnev (transl.), Moscow: Izdatel'skiy dom “Territoriya budushchego”, pp. 14–221. (In Russian).

Wittgenstein L. (2020) Zettel [Zettel], V.Anashvili (transl.), Moscow: Ad Marginem. (In Russian).

Wittgenstein L. (2018) Logiko-filosofskiy traktat [Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus], L.Dobrosel'­skiy (transl.), Moscow: AST. (In Russian).

Wyrzykowski M. (2016) Bypassing the Constitution or Changing the Constitutional Order outside the Constitution. In: Szmyt A., Banaszak B. (eds.) Transformation of Law Systems in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe in 1989–2015, Gdańsk: Gdańsk University Press, pp. 159–179.

Yur'yeva D. (2020) “Ne govori nikomu”. Pedofiliya kak instrument pol'skoy politiki [“Don’t tell anyone”. Pedophilia as an instrument of Polish politics]. Radio Svoboda, 28 May. Available at: https://www.svoboda.org/a/30639505.html (accessed: 06.02.2022). (In Russian).

Zanussi K. (2020) Kak nam zhit'? Moi strategii [How are we to live? My strategies], D.Viren (transl.), Moscow: Korvus. (In Russian).

Žižek S. (2021) The Lessons We Can Learn from China’s Silence on a “Missing” Tennis Player. RT, 24 November. Available at: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/541079-china-missing-tennis-player/ (accessed: 06.02.2022).