Available in Russian
Author: Peter H. Solomon, Jr.
Keywords: judicial reform; efficiency of the judiciary; judicial independence; judicial power; simplified (abbreviated process) procedure; plea bargaining; judicial governance; 2020 constitutional amendments in Russia; future of courts in Russia
This article provides a detailed overview of the process of judicial reform in the Russian Federation, with emphasis on the past fifteen years. It argues that the political context plays a decisive role in which reforms get adopted and implemented. After reviewing struggles in the late Yeltsin and early Putin years to find a balance between the independence and accountability of judges, it charts the zig-zag pattern of reform and counter-reform that prevailed since 2005 and remained notably unchanged throughout the arguably liberal Medvedev presidency. In the realm of judicial governance this included the increasing role of the Presidential Commission on Judicial Nominations in selection and promotion of candidates for judgeships, the elimination of the High Arbitrazh Court, and the gradual subordination of the Constitutional Court to its political masters – all signs of a judicial counter-reform that reflected growing authoritarianism in the political realm. At the same time, a series of measures, often initiatives of Supreme Court Chairman Vyacheslav Lebedev, were undertaken to improve the efficiency of the courts. These included the expansion of judicial capacity (with the creation of the new justices of the peace); several simplifications of civil, arbitrazh, and criminal procedure (through the use of judicial orders, summary procedure, court fines, and the guilty plea procedure); the remaking of the system of appeals; and the replacement of some crimes with administrative offenses. A significant portion of the article also focuses on what consequences the reforms (especially ones relating to the jurisdiction of the courts) had on the number of jury trials, which in Russia result in a high rate of acquittals. The article concludes with a snapshot of the courts in early 2020, of the ideas for further reform that were in the air (especially those offered by the Kudrin team), and of the impact on the courts of the Constitutional Amendments of 2020 and of the special military operation in Ukraine, as well as with thoughts on the changing reality of the dialogue between Russian scholars and their colleagues abroad and on how the above-mentioned events may affect the prospects for future judicial reform.
About the author: Peter H. Solomon, Jr. – Emeritus Professor of Political Science, Law and Criminology at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Citation: Solomon P.H., Jr. (2023) Izvilistyy put’ sudebnoy reformy v sovremennoy Rossii [The winding path of judicial reform in modern Russia]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 95–110. (In Russian).
Agadzhanov М. (2018) Spravochnaya. Roskomnadzor, chto ty takoe? [Reference. Roskomnadzor, what are you?]. Khabr, 17 June. Available at: https://habr.com/ru/post/414335/ (accessed 10.02.2023).
Bocharov T. Yu., Volkov V. V., Voskobitova L. A., Dmitrieva A. V., Smola A. A., Titaev K. D., Tsvetkov I. V. (2018) Predlozheniya po sovershenstvovaniyu sudebnoy sistemy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i izmeneniya normativnykh aktov v tselyakh ikh realizatsii [Proposals for improving the judicial system in the Russian Federation and amendments to regulations in order to implement them], Saint Petersburg: Institut problem pravoprimeneniya. Available at: https://enforce.spb.ru/images/Products/reports/Report_Justice_System_Preview.pdf
Bowring B. (2018) Politics and Pragmatism: The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and Its 20 Years of Engagement with the European Convention on Human Rights. East European Yearbook on Human Rights, vol. 1, pp. 5–31.
Dzmitryieva A. (2021) Becoming a Judge in Russia: An Analysis of Judicial Biographies. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 131–156.
Grigoriev I.S. (2021) What Changes for the Constitutional Court with the New Russian Constitution? Russian Politics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 27–49.
Hendley K. (2017) Everyday Law in Russia, Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press.
Hendley K., Solomon P.H., Jr. (2023) The Judicial System of Russia, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Forthcoming).
Khozhdaeva E. (2022) Sudy s uchastiem prisyazhnykh v 2018–2021 godakh: statisticheskaya spravka po itogam trekh let posle reformy [Jury trials in 2018–2021: statistical information on the results of three years after the reform], Saint Petersburg: Institut problem pravoprimeneniya. Available at: https://enforce.spb.ru/chronicle/news/7619-statisticheskaya-spravka-sudy-s-uchastiem-prisyazhnykh-v018-2021-godakh (accessed: 10.02.2023). (In Russian).
Kondrat’eva I. (2018) Otfil’trovali: pochemu kandidaty v sud’i ne prokhodyat prezidentskuyu komissiyu [Filtered out: why judicial candidates do not pass the presidential commission]. Pravo.ru, 20 July. Available at: https://pravo.ru/story/204155 (accessed: 10.02.2023).
Kornya A., Rozhkova E. (2022) Sovet da nelyubov’: kak Rossiya perestala byt’ Evropoy [Sovet da nelyubov’: how Russia ceased to be Europe]. Kommersant, 20 March. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5269636 (accessed: 10.02.2023).
Kovalev N., Nasonov S. (2021) The Russian Jury Trial: An Ongoing Legal and Political Experiment. In: Ivković S.K. et al. (eds.) Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts: A Global Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237–260.
Medushevskiy A.N. (ed.) (2022) Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossii: osmyslenie opyta [The Constitutional Court of Russia: understanding the experience], Moscow: Tsentr konstitutsionnykh issledovaniy. (In Russian).
Mel’nikova A. (2022) Sudy v RF smyagchayut prigovory za uchastie v voyne s Ukrainoy [Courts in the Russian Federation commute sentences for participation in the war with Ukraine]. Deutsche Welle, 18 November. Available at: https://www.dw.com/ru/rossijskie-sudy-smagcaut-prigovory-za-ucastie-v-vojne-s-ukrainoj/a-63813324 (accessed: 10.02.2023).
Mironova S.V., Yurishina E.A. (2022) Rossiya i Sovet Evropy: put’ dlinoy v 26 let: Doklad o tom, chto proizoshlo za eti gody i pochemu chlenstvo v SE bylo vazhnym dlya Rossii [Russia and the Council of Europe: a 26-year journey: A report on what has happened over the years and why membership in the Council of Europe was important for Russia], Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoy politiki. Available at: http://reports.ilpp. ru/russia-coe-echr/ (accessed: 10.02.2023). (In Russian).
Morshchakova T. (2005) Kontrreforma: ugroza i real’nost’ [Counterreform: threat and reality]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 61–68. (In Russian).
Petrov I. (2022) Verkhovnyy sud RF priznal ukrainskiy natspolk “Azov” terroristicheskoy organizatsiey [The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation recognized the Ukrainian national regiment “Azov” as a terrorist organization]. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 2 August. Available at: https://rg.ru/2022/08/02/verhovnyj-sud-rf-priznal-ukrainskij-nacpolk-azov-terroristicheskoj-organizaciej.html (accessed: 10.02.2023).
Rogov K. (ed.) (2020) Dekonstruktsiya Konstitutsii: chto nuzhno i chto ne nuzhno menyat’ v rossiyskom Osnovnom Zakone [Deconstruction of the Constitution: what should and what should not be changed in the Russian Basic Law], Moscow: Fond “Liberal’naya missiya”. (In Russian).
Schwartz O. (2022) Recent Judicial Reforms in Russia: Justice or Efficiency? Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 69–88.
Solomon P.H. (2011) Podotchetnost’ sudey v postkommunisticheskikh gosudarstvakh: ot byurokraticheskoy k professional’noy podotchetnosti [Accountability of judges in post-Communist States: from bureaucratic to professional accountability]. In: Volkov V.V. (ed.) Pravo i pravoprimenenie v Rossii: mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya [Law and law enforcement in Russia: interdisciplinary research], Moscow: Statut, pp. 80–107. (In Russian).
Solomon P.H., Jr. (2005) Ugroza sudebnoy kontrreformy v Rossii [Threats of judicial counterreform in Putin’s Russia]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 50–60. (In Russian).
Solomon P. H., Jr. (2008) Problema nezavisimosti i podotchetnosti sudey v Rossiyskoy Konstitutsii 1993 g. [The problem of independence and accountability of judges in the Russian Constitution of 1993]. Konstitutsionnyy vestnik: problemy realizatsii konstitutsii, no. 1, pp. 180–191.
Solomon P.H., Jr. (2009) Sovershenstvovanie rossiyskogo pravosudiya: rol’ model’nykh sudov [Improving Russian justice: the role of model courts]. Rossiyskoe pravosudie, no. 2, pp. 12–26. (In Russian).
Solomon P.H., Jr. (2010) Improving Russian Justice with Foreign Assistance: Model Courts and the Tactical Approach. Governance, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 437–462.
Solomon P.H., Jr. (2012) Courts, Law and Policing under Medvedev: Many Reforms, Modest Change, New Voices. In: Black J.L., Johns M. (eds.) Russia after 2012: From Putin to Medvedev to Putin – Continuity, Change, or Revolution, London: Routledge, pp. 19–41.
Solomon P.H., Jr. (2012) Sdelka s pravosudiem v Rossii: osobyy poryadok sudebnogo razbiratel’stva [A deal with justice in Russia: a special procedure for judicial proceedings]. In: Volkov V.V. (ed.) Kak sud’i prinimayut resheniya: empiricheskie issledovaniya prava [How judges make decisions: empirical studies of law], Moscow: Statut, pp. 156–176. (In Russian).
Solomon P.H., Jr. (2014) The Unexpected Demise of Russia’s High Arbitrazh Court and the Politicization of Judicial Reform. Russian Analytical Digest, no. 147, pp. 2–4.
Trochev A. (2022) Three sources of dynamism of Russia’s constitutional law and the multiple roles of the Russian Constitutional Court. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 125–146.
Trochev A., Solomon P.H., Jr. (2018) Authoritarian Constitutionalism in Putin’s Russia: A Pragmatic Constitutional Court in a Dual State. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 201–214.