Available in Russian
Author: Vladislav Tolstykh
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2024-1-161-182
Keywords: сomparative law; constitutionalism; human rights; discrimination; Southeast Asia; Buddhism; Theravada; religious organizations
Sri Lanka’s legal system is highly constitutionalised, including with regard to the status of Buddhism. Constitutional rules and procedures are used to protect Buddhist teachings and to regulate the life of the sangha and its interaction with society, as well as the activities of other denominations. These norms take into account not only democratic values but also the value of Buddhism as a majority religion. This article examines the history of statehood and Buddhism in Ceylon, the constitutional status of Buddhism, the practice of the Sri Lankan government in imposing restrictions on freedom of religion, the practice of the Supreme Court in cases involving these restrictions, and the relationship between religious practices and human rights. The model used by Sri Lanka is a hybrid one: on the one hand, it grants legal privileges to a particular religion and, on the other hand, enshrines freedom of religion and the principle of non-discrimination. The author tries to answer three questions: whether the Sri Lankan model is an effective way to address political problems, whether it conforms to human rights standards, and whether it strengthens the sangha and sasana. The constitutionalisation of Buddhism has a twofold effect: on the one hand, it contributes to the involvement of monks in public and political life, and, on the other hand, it turns Buddhist doctrine into an element of the political system and legal order. This phenomenon of constitutionalisation has both positive and negative sides: the former includes the preservation of Buddhist tradition and its positive impact on society, while the latter includes the aggravation of inter-confessional conflicts. Russia approaches religious issues in a fundamentally different way – from a position of formal neutrality. Unlike Sri Lanka, it does not face the problem of inter-ethnic or religious enmity. However, it has an obvious need to humanize social relations and actually translate religious values into everyday life – and here it could borrow a lot from Sri Lanka’s experience.
About the author: Vladislav Tolstykh – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, Department of International Law, MGIMO of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia; Chief Researcher, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Tolstykh V. (2024) Shri-Lanka: konstitutsionalizatsiya religioznykh otnosheniy i problema diskriminatsii men’shinstv [Sri Lanka: constitutionalisation of relations of religious groups and the problem of discrimination against minorities]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 161–182. (In Russian).
References
Ahdar R.J., Leigh I. (2009) Religious Freedom in the Liberal State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Livera S. (2019) Religion, State, and a Conflict of Duties: A Constitutional Problem in Sri Lanka: MA Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Windsor. Available at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8782&context=etd (accessed: 17.03.2024).
Esufally S. (2015) Judicial Responses to Religious Freedom: A Case Analysis. Available at: https://dataspace.princeton.edu/handle/88435/dsp018c97kt68z (accessed: 17.03.2024).
Gunatilleke G. (2023) Limitations on Fundamental Freedoms in Sri Lanka: Majoritarian Influence of Constitutional Practice. International Journal of Law in Context, vol.19, pp.334–351.
Jones R.N.B. (2015) Sinhala Buddhist Nationalism and Islamophobia in Contemporary Sri Lanka: BA Thesis, The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology, Bates College. Available at: https://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/126 (accessed: 02.03.2024).
Lerner H. (2010) Constitution-Writing in Deeply Divided Societies: The Incrementalist Approach. Nations and Nationalism, vol.16, no.1, pp.68–88.
Neo J.L. (2018) Review: Benjamin Schonthal. Buddhism, Politics and the Limits of Law: The Pyrrhic Constitutionalism of Sri Lanka. Cambridge University Press, 2016. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.16, no.2, pp.720–723.
Pushparajah N. (2019) United in Diversity: A Third Way of Constitutional Vision in Post-War Sri Lanka. Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies, vol.5, no.2, pp.196–228.
Ratnam N. (2018) Religion and State: Revisions Needed in Sri Lankan Constitutional Implications. Kathmandu School of Law Review, vol.6, no.1, pp.134–141.
Schonthal B. (2016) Securing the Sasana through Law: Buddhist Constitutionalism and Buddhist-Interest Litigation in Sri Lanka. Modern Asian Studies, vol.50, no.6, pp.1966–2008.
Schonthal B. (2018) Litigating Vinaya: Buddhist Law and Public Law in Contemporary Sri Lanka. Buddhism, Law & Society, vol.3, pp.69–112.
Schonthal B. (2018) Stanovlenie i razvitie buddiyskogo konstitutsionalizma v Yuzhnoy i Yugo-Vostochnoy Azii [Formations of Buddhist constitutionalism in South and Southeast Asia]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.27, no.4, pp.57–84. (In Russian).
Schonthal В. (2016) Buddhism, Politics and the Limits of Law: The Pyrrhic Constitutionalism of Sri Lanka, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Udin Z. (2021) Religious Freedom Conditions in Sri Lanka. Available at: https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/2021-10/2021%20Sri%20Lanka%20Country%20Update_0.pdf (accessed: 17.03.2024).
Welikala A. (2017) The Idea of Constitutional Incrementalism: CPA Working Paper on Constitutional Reform No.14. Available at: http://constitutionalreforms.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Working-Paper-14.pdf (accessed: 17.03.2024).
Wijayalath A. (2018) Constitutional Contestation of Religion in Sri Lanka: NUS Centre for Asian Legal Studies Working Paper 18/03, National University of Singapore. Available at: https://law.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/CALS-WPS-1803.pdf (accessed: 17.03.2024).