Available in Russian
Author: Sergey Marochkin
Keywords: Constitution of the Russian Federation; constitutional amendments; constitutions of foreign countries; constitutional courts; international law; the legal system of the country; RCC; ECHR; ECtHR; Venice Commission
The article is devoted to assessing the significance for the legal system of the Russian Federation of constitutional amendments relating to international law which are of substantial importance among the numerous amendments introduced by the Law of 2020. They relate to a very specific issue of the possibility of refusing to comply with decisions of international jurisdictional bodies, but in fact reflect a fundamental change in the country’s attitude to its obligations in international community and the role for it of international law in general. The origins of such a turn are shown. It was set up in 2015 by the judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the RCC) and by the federal constitutional law. Now they are enshrined at the highest level in the Constitution. The author argues that the widespread opinions and statements about the similar policy of foreign countries referring to their constitutions and judicial practice do not fully reflect the actual situation. Russia is essentially the only country with such a position regarding the acts of international bodies. The real meaning of the amendments is not to ensure the supremacy of the Constitution, which was not necessary from a legal point of view. They are to entrench barriers to “inconvenient” decisions of international bodies. Failure to comply with them entails a violation of obligations under international law.
About the author: Sergey Marochkin – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia.
Citation: Marochkin S. (2022) Konstitutsionnye popravki o roli mezhdunarodnykh obyazatel’stv v pravovoy sisteme Rossii: vperyod, v proshloe? [Constitutional amendments on the role of international obligations in the legal system of Russia: forward towards the past?]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 105–124. (In Russian).
Aksenova M., Marchuk I. (2018) Reinventing or Rediscovering International Law? The Russian Constitutional Court’s Uneasy Dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1322–1346.
Black J.L. (2022) Russia after 2020: Looking Ahead after Two Decades of Putin, London: Routledge.
Blankenagel A. (2019) The Relationship between the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: A Reply to Jeffrey Kahn. European Journal of International Law, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 961–969.
Son Bui N. (2021) Russia’s Big-Bang Constitutional Amendments. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 751–785.
Butler W.E. (2020) International Law in the Russian Legal System, New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Domańska M. (2020) “Everlasting Putin” and the Reform of the Russian Constitution. OSW. Centre for Eastern Studies, 13 March. Available at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2020-03-13/everlasting-putin-and-reform-russian-constitution (accessed: 30.03.2022).
Ioffe Y. (2020) The Amendments to the Russian Constitution: Putin’s Attempt to Reinforce Russia’s Isolationist Views on International Law? EJIL: Talk! 29 January. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-amendments-to-the-russian-constitution-putins-attempt-to-reinforce-russias-isolationist-views-on-international-law/ (accessed: 30.03.2022).
Kahn J. (2019) The Relationship between the European Court of Human Rights and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: Conflicting Conceptions of Sovereignty in Strasbourg and St Petersburg. European Journal of International Law, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 933–959.
Kahn J. (2019) Conflicting Conceptions of Sovereignty: A Response to Professor Blankenagel. EJIL: Talk! 28 January. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/conflicting-conceptions-of-sovereignty-a-response-to-professor-blankenagel/ (accessed: 30.03.2022).
Kalinichenko P., Kochenov D.V. (2021) Amendments to the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation Concerning International Law (2020). International Legal Materials, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 341–346.
Krieger H. (2019) Populist Governments and International Law. European Journal of International Law, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 971–996.
Kunz R. (2019) Judging International Judgments Anew? The Human Rights Courts Before Domestic Courts. European Journal of International Law, vol. 30, no. 4, pр.1129–1163.
Malksoo L., Benedek W. (eds.) (2018) Russia and the European Court of Human Rights. The Strasbourg Effect, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mälksoo L. (2021) International Law and the 2020 Amendments to the Russian Constitution. American Journal of International Law, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 78–93.
Marochkin S.Yu. (2019) The Operation of International Law in the Russian Legal System: A Changing Approach, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Nelaeva G.A., Khabarova E.A., Sidorova N.V. (2020) Russia’s Relations with the European Court of Human Rights in the Aftermath of the Markin Decision: Debating the “Backlash”. Human Rights Review, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 93–112.
Partlett W. (2021) Russia’s 2020 Constitutional Amendments: A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, vol. 23, pp. 311–342.
Teague E. (2020) Russia’s Constitutional Reforms of 2020. Russian Politics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 301–328.
Verlaine A., Shashkova A., Kudryashova E. (2020) Amendments of Russian Constitution Concerning International Law and the BRICS. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 337–353.
Vinogradova P., Tulaev A. (2021) The Legal Positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the Execution of Decisions Made by the European Court of Human Rights. Russian Law Journal, vol. IX, no. 1, pp. 138–164.
Zimnenko B.L. (2007) International Law and the Russian Legal System, W.E.Butler (transl.), Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing.