Quasi-judicial removal procedures of judges in Russia and the United States of America

Available in Russian

Price 180 Rub.

Author: Irina Kuznetsova

DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2022-2-88-104

Keywords: judicial independence guarantees; American judge’s impeachment; other judge’s majoritarian removal procedures; presidential and parliamentary powers of judge’s removal in the Russian Federation; amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation 2020


The article analyzes the Russian innovation of removal of a judge, based on legislation after entry into force of a Federal Law amending the Constitution of the Russian Federation and compares it with the process of impeachment, one long-known in countries of the Anglo-American legal system, and used in the United States in particular. The article is aimed at identifying the commonalities, differences, and priorities of judicial removal procedures in Russia and the U.S.A. The author conducts to that end a comparative legal analysis of all stages of removal, as well as of the activities of the subjects of judicial removal proceedings in the United States and Russia, starting with the initiation of proceedings and up to the termination of the judge’s authority. In the author’s view, an American judge’s impeachment is a quasi-judicial procedure, which deserves attention because of its greater guarantee of judicial independence and its protection against persecution and arbitrariness leading to conviction and removal from office. This is facilitated by, first, mandatory participation of a body of the Judicial Community, the Judicial Conference; second, the participation of Congress in impeachment decision making, so as to guarantee the independence of the procedure, including its independence from the executive branch; thirdly, in order to ensure the independence of the judiciary in the American impeachment model, the principles of transparency, openness to the public and adversarialness are its basic elements; and fourthly, decisions advancing the impeachment of a judge are taken collegially at all stages of the procedure.

About the author: Irina Kuznetsova – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, School of Court Proceedings and Criminal Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Kuznetsova I. (2022) Kvazisudebnye parlamentarnye protsedury lisheniya sud’i statusa v Rossii i Soedinyonnykh Shtatakh Ameriki [Quasi-judicial removal procedures of judges in Russia and the United States of America]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 88–104. (In Russian).


Domrin A.N. (2004) Konstitutsionnaya protsedura impichmenta SShA [U.S. constitutional impeachment procedure]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no. 7, pp. 146–156. (In Russian).

Evseev A.P. (2022) Eticheskiy faktor v deyatel'nosti konstitutsionnogo sud'i [Ethical factor in the activity of a constitutional judge]. In: Medushevskiy A.N. (ed.) Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossii: osmyslenie opyta [The Constitutional Court of Russia: аn analysis of the experience], Moscow: Tsentr konstitutsionnykh issledovaniy, pp. 447–474. (In Russian).

Il'inskiy I.P., Krylova N.S., Kovler A.I. and others (1991) Parlamenty mira [Parliaments of the world], Moscow: Interpraks. (In Russian).

Neshataeva T.N. (ed.) (2011) Modernizatsiya statusa sud'i: sovremennye mezhdunarodnye podkhody [Modernisation of the judge status: contemporary comparative cross-national approaches], Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M. (In Russian).

Mambetova K.M. (2013) Dosrochnoe prekrashchenie polnomochiy Prezidenta SShA. Pravovaya osnova i praktika primeneniya [Early termination of the powers of President of the United States. The legal basis and the practice of application]. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek, no. 2, pp. 135–142. (In Russian).

Morshchakova T. (2017) Sudebnoe upravlenie v mezhdunarodnykh normakh “myagkogo prava” i rossiyskikh praktikakh [Judicial management in international systems of the “soft law” and in the Russian judicial practices]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.26, no. 1, pp. 81–94. (In Russian).

Leonhardt D. (2021) The Disqualification Question. And What Else You Need to Know Today. The New York Times, 11 January. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/11/briefing/trump-impeachment-plane-crash-florida-coronavirus.html (accessed: 31.03.2022).

Navarro Smelcer S. (2010) The Role of the Senate in Judicial Impeachment Proceedings: Procedure, Practice, and Data. Available at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R41172.pdf (accessed: 31.03.2022).

Navarro Smelcer S., Palmer B. (2010) The Role of the House of Representatives in Judicial Impeachment Proceedings: Procedure, Practice, and Data. Available at: https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20100315_R41110_c75a035d5eeebdba691c3e45276a882ecd38e7ad.pdf (accessed: 31.03.2022).

Rogov K. (ed.) (2020) Dekonstruktsiya Konstitutsii: Chto nuzhno i chto ne nuzhno menyat' v rossiyskom Osnovnom Zakone [Deconstruction of the Constitution: What should and should not be changed in the Russian Basic Law], Moscow: Fond “Liberal'naya missiya”. (In Russian).

Rybicki E., Greene M. (2019) The Impeachment Process in the House of Representatives. Available at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R45769.pdf (accessed: 31.03.2022).