Identity and transformation of modern law

This article is about the reasons, features, and prospects for the development of so-called defensive constitutionalism. The author tried to generalize the results of legal disputes and scientific discussions about identity. She also highlighted the main ones and focusing on certain shades that would help to understand their causes and features. For example, on the problem of the correlation between the concepts of national and constitutional identities, on the defensive-sovereign nature of the reasons for the transformation of one concept into another, and on the inadmissibility of mixing them. A particular form of defense constitutionalism is artificial constitutional identity. The article analyzes its European samples in Hungary and Latvia. To assess the limits of judicial interpretation in identity disputes, it is proposed to introduce a criterion of constitutional integrity. At the same time with lawyers, political scientists have also concluded that the problem of identity is becoming more acute in the world. They analyze the processes of globalization and it is in them that they find the origins of this phenomenon. Thus, the roots of the legal debate are deeper than just a dispute about the relationship between national and supranational legislation. They are just a natural consequence of geopolitics, which, in turn, is expressed not only in legal conflicts, but is embodied in the ways, forms and content of legal regulation in General and constitutional law in particular. Because every legal process is just a mirror of the public process. In the modern world, society is increasingly moving beyond its national borders, gradually gaining common supranational cultural ideological and philosophical features. Accordingly, the law goes the same way, not easily and sometimes painfully developing its new supranational identity. The article combines two subjects – political science and law. At first glance, it may seem that they do not have an obvious connection. But this is not true. According to the author, both processes are inseparable parts of the big picture of the modern world. Without their connection, it is impossible to understand what is happening and adequately foresee the future. Just as it is impossible in modern conditions of progressive knowledge of the world to evaluate any phenomena in the narrowly closed framework of a single science.

About the author: Elena Lukyanova – Lawyer, Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, Faculty of Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Lukyanova E. (2020) Identichnost' i transformatsiya sovremennogo prava [Identity and transformation of modern law]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.29, no.3, pp.130–147.

References

Arnold R. (2015) Common Legal Thinking in European Constitutionalism: Some Reflections. In: Blanke H.-J., Cruz Villalón P., Klein T., Ziller J. (eds.) Common European Legal Thinking: Essays in Honour of Albrecht Weber, Cham: Springer, pp.41–56.

Belov S. (2012) Tsennostnoe obosnovanie resheniy kak proyavlenie sudebnogo aktivizma Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The value-based approach to the argumentation as a form of judicial activism of the Russian Constitutional Court]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.21, no.2, pp.140–150. (In Russian).

Besselink L.F.M. (2010) National and Constitutional Identity Before and After Lisbon. Utrecht Law Review, vol.6, no.3, pp.36–49.

Cloots E. (2016) National Identity, Constitutional Identity, and Sovereignty in the EU. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, vol.45, no.2, pp.82–98.

Dixon R., Landau D. (2016) Transnatsional'nyy konstitutsionalizm i ograni­chennaya doktrina nekonstitutsionnogo izmeneniya konstitutsii [Transnational constitutionalism and a limited doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.25, no.2, pp.32–63. (In Russian).

Doswald-Bek L. (1997) Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo i Konsul'­tativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo Suda otnositel'no zakonnosti ugrozy yadernym oruzhiem ili ego primeneniya [International humanitarian law and the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice concerning the lawfullnes of the threat or use of nuclear weapons]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta, no.14, pp.43–68. (In Russian).

Faraguna P. (2015) L’identità nazionale nell’Unione europea come problema e come soluzione. Il Mulino, vol.64, no.5, pp.866–875.

Fukuyama F. (2019) Identichnost': Stremlenie k priznaniyu i politika nepriyatiya [Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment], A.Solov'ev (transl.), Moscow: Al'pina Publisher. (In Russian).

Ispolinov A. Eto est' ikh posledniy i reshitel'nyy boy? Konstitutsionnye sudy Evropy protiv evropeyskikh mezhdunarodnykh sudov [Is this their last fight? The Consitutional Courts of Europe against the European international courts]. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/02/20/eto_est_ih_poslednij_i_reshitelnyj_boj_konstitucionnye_sudy_evropy_protiv_evropejskih_mezhdunarodnyh (accessed: 01.05.2020). (In Russian).

Ispolinov A. Uskol'zayushchaya krasota natsional'noy konstitutsionnoy identichnosti: sudebnaya praktika Evropeyskogo Soyuza [The stealing beauty of the national constitutional identity: the jurisprudence in the European Union]. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/5/17/uskolzayuschaya_krasota_nacionalnoj_konstitucionnoj_identichnosti_sudebnaya_praktika_evropejskogo_so (accessed: 01.05.2020). (In Russian).

Koncewicz T.T. (2015) Constitutional Identity in the European Legal Space and the Comity of Circumspect Constitutioinal Courts. Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, vol.XXXIII, pp.195–215.

Kruss V.I. (2010) Konstitutsionnaya prezumptsiya dobrosovestnosti i problemy ee otraslevoy “konkretizatsii” [The Constitutional presumption of good faith and the issues of its concretization in specific branches of law]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, no.4, pp.276–289. (In Russian).

Levits E. (2000) Samēriguma princips publiskajās tiesībās – jus commune europaeum un Satversmē ietvertais konstitucionāla ranga princips. Likums un Tiesībās, no.9, pp.262–270. (In Latvian).

Minakov M. (2020) Dialektika sovremennosti v Vostochnoy Evrope. Opyt so­tsial'no-filosofskogo osmysleniya [The dialectics of modern times in the Eastern Europe. The experience of socio-philosophical conceptualization], Kiev: Laurus. (In Russian).

Pustogarov V.V. (2000) Ogovorka Martensa – istoriya i yuridicheskoe soderzhanie [The Martens clause – history and legal content]. Pravo i politika, no.3, pp.141–148. (In Russian).

Sajó A., Uitz R. (2010) Constitutional Topography: Values and Constitutions, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

Sajó A., Uitz R. (2017) The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scheppele K.L. (2013) The Rule of Law and the Frankenstate: Why Governance Checklists Do Not Work. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, vol.26, no.4, pp.559–562.

Solomatina H.V. (2013) Diskussiya o konstitutsii Vengrii 2011 g. i problemy razvitiya evropeyskogo konstitutsionalizma v XXI veke [The discussion on the Constitution of Hungary in 2011 and the issues of development of European constitutionalism in the XXI century]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, no.1, pp.115–120. (In Russian).

Sten'kin D.S. (2017) Kharakter konstitutsionnykh popravok k osnovnomu zakonu Vengrii v period s 2012 po 2016 gg. [Character of constitutional amendments to the basic law of Hungary from 2011 to 2016]. Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, vol.7, no.1A, pp.110–116. (In Russian).

Taykherst R. (1977) Ogovorka Martensa i pravo vooruzhennykh konfliktov [The Martens Clause and the law of armed conflict]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta, no.15, pp.149–154. (In Russian).

Troitskaya A., Khramova T. (2018) Osnovy osnov: ekspressivnyy i funktsio­nal'nyy potentsial konstitutsionnykh ustremleniy [Basic essentials: the expressive and functional potential of the constitutional aspirations]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.27, no.1, pp.54–79. (In Russian).

Uitz R. (2019) Izobretenie novoy Vengrii v pylu revolyutsii: Deklaratsiya natsional'nogo sotrudnichestva kak rukovodstvo dlya chitatelya po Osnovnomu zakonu 2011 goda [Reinventing Hungary with revolutionary fervor: The declaration of national cooperation as a reader's guide to the Fundamental law of 2011]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.28, no.1, pp.42–60. (In Russian).

Vasilieva T.A. (2019) Sud ES i konstitutsionnye sudy gosudarstv – chlenov Evropeyskogo Soyuza v poiskakh konstitutsionnoy identichnosti [The Court of Justice of the EU and constitutional courts of EU member states in search of constitutional identity]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, vol.14, no.2, pp.32–54. (In Russian).