Available in Russian
Author: Tatiana Khramova
Keywords: Bill of Rights; constitutional rights; High Court of Australia; implied rights; parliamentary supremacy
Australian constitutional model is quite unique for two reasons: first, it is based on the principle of parliamentary supremacy with no written Bill of Rights; second, it is astonishingly stable and resistant to change. Constitutional text contains few explicit rights provisions and is supplemented by a modest and unsystematic collection of implied rights recognized by the High Court of Australia. In spite of the lack of constitutional regulation of rights, the actual level of fundamental rights protection in Australia, determined by various ratings and indexes, is one of the highest in the world. Together with other – more substantial and deep-rooted – causes this explains two tendencies observed in contemporary Australia and scrutinized in a given article: 1) unwillingness to adopt a federal Bill of Rights (in the form of constitutional amendments or a legislative act); 2) unwillingness of the High Court to expand and deepen the potential of existing Constitution by broad and creative interpretation of its provisions. As for the first tendency, the following arguments of the Bill of Rights opponents attract our interest: commitment to Australian exceptionalism and confidence in the existing system of rights protection; supremacy of parliament; and speculations that protection of rights may weaken as a result of adoption of an abstract Bill of Rights. Caution and self-restraint of the High Court of Australia could be explained by the eagerness to preserve its legitimacy and maintain high authority of its decisions in the society which has delegated the prerogative of solving controversial problems, including those related to definition and restriction of rights, to the legislator. The study of peculiar features of Australian constitutional order and legal culture brings the author of this article to interesting conclusions.
Citation: Khramova T. (2016) Avstraliya: Konstitutsiya bez prav i prava vne Konstitutsii [Australia: A Constitution without Rights and Rights outside the Constitution]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.4, pp.14–28. (In Russian).
Allan T.R.S. (1996) The Common Law as Constitution: Fundamental Rights and First Principles. In: Saunders C. (ed.) Courts of Final Jurisdiction: The Mason Court in Australia, Annandale, NSW: The Federation Press, pp.146–166.
Arcioni E., Stone A. (2016) The Small Brown Bird: Values and Aspirations in the Australian Constitution. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.14, no.1, pp.60–79.
Clarke J., Keyzer P., Stellios J. (2009) Hanks’ Australian Constitutional Law: Materials and Commentary, 8th ed., Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths.
Detmold M. (1994) The New Constitutional Law. Sydney Law Review, vol.16, no.2, pp.228–249.
Dillard I. (ed.) (1952) The Spirit of Liberty: Papers and Addresses of Learned Hand, New York: Knopf.
Evans C. (2012) Legal Protection of Religious Freedom in Australia, Annandale, NSW: The Federation Press.
French R. (2009) The Constitution and the Protection of Human Rights: Paper presented at Edith Cowan University, Perth, 20 November, pp.1–34. Available at: http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/speeches/current-justices/frenchcj/frenchcj20nov09.pdf (accessed 01.07.2016).
Galligan B., Morton F.L. (2006) Australian Exceptionalism: Rights Protection without a Bill of Rights. In: Campbell T., Goldsworthy J., Stone A. (eds.) Protecting Rights without a Bill of Rights: Institutional Performance and Reform in Australia, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp.17–39.
Gibbs H. (1995) Chapter Seven: Does Australia Need a Bill of Rights? Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the Samuel Griffith Society, 17–19 November, Carlton. Available at: http://www.samuelgriffith.org.au/papers/html/volume6/v6conts.htm (accessed 01.07.2016).
Goldsworthy J. (2006) Australia: Devotion to Legalism. In: Goldsworthy J. (ed.) Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.106–160.
Goldsworthy J. (2006) Introduction. In: Campbell T., Goldsworthy J., Stone A. (eds.) Protecting Rights without a Bill of Rights: Institutional Performance and Reform in Australia, Aldershot; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp.1–13.
Goldsworthy J. (2012) Constitutional Cultures, Democracy, and Unwritten Principles. University of Illinois Law Review, vol.2012, no.3, pp.683–710.
Kirby M. (1993) Lionel Murphy and The Power of Ideas: The Dissenter’s Views Begin to Prevail. Alternative Law Journal, vol.18, no.6, pp.253–259. Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AltLawJl/1993/106.pdf (accessed 01.07.2016).
McHugh M.H. (2001) Does Chapter III of the Constitution Protect Substantive as Well as Procedural Rights? Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association, Summer 2001–2002. P.34–42. Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/NSWBarAssocNews/2001/95.html (accessed 01.07.2016).
Patapan H. (1997) Competing Visions of Liberalism: Theoretical Underpinnings of the Bill of Rights Debate in Australia. Melbourne University Law Review, vol.21, pp.497–514.
Schweber H., Mayer K. (2008) Does Australia Have a Constitution? Part II: The Rights Constitution. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, vol.25, no.2, pp.265–355. Available at: http://users.polisci.wisc.edu/kmayer/Professional/Australian%20Constitutionalism%20Part%20II.pdf (accessed 01.07.2016).
Stellios J. (2001) Brownlee v The Queen: Method in the Madness. Federal Law Review, vol.29, no.2, pp.319–339.
Stone A. (2005) Australia’s Constitutional Rights and the Problem of Interpretive Disagreement. Sydney Law Review, vol.27, no.1, pp.29–48. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1660240 (accessed 01.07.2016).
Stone A. (2011) “Insult and Emotion, Calumny and Invective”: Twenty Years of Freedom of Political Communication. University of Queensland Law Journal, vol.30, no.1, pp.79–97.
Waldron J. (1993) A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol.13, no.1, pp.18–51.
Waldron J. (1999) Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Williams G. (1994) Civil Liberties and the Constitution – A Question of Interpretation. Public Law Review, vol.5, no.2, pp.82–103.
Williams G. (1999) Human Rights Under the Australian Constitution, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Williams G. (1998–1999) The Federal Parliament and the Protection of Human Rights, Research Paper 20, Parliamentary Research Service, Commonwealth Parliament, pp.1–27. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp9899/99rp20 (accessed 01.07.2016).
Winterton G. (1986) Extra-Constitutional Notions in Australian Constitutional Law. Federal Law Review, vol.16, pp.223–239.
Zines L. (2008) The High Court and the Constitution, 5th ed., Sydney: The Federation Press.