Available in Russian
Author: Vladislav Tolstykh
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2023-4-122-146
Keywords: comparative law; constitutionalism; Southeast Asia; Buddhism; Theravada; sangha; monastic law; religious organizations
The article discusses the features of Thai Buddhism, specifics of the religious legitimation of political power in Thailand, the history of relations between the Thai state and the Buddhist sangha, the constitutional and legal status of the latter, legal mechanisms for resolving conflicts that arise between the sangha and the state, the dynamics of development of Thai constitutionalism, and the reform of the sangha initiated by the military government after the 2014 coup. As a result of the systematic efforts of the monarchs of the Chakri dynasty and their entourage, the Thai sangha was placed under the direct control of the crown and its hierarchy was in fact fused with the state. There were several attempts of resistance in the 20th century but they all failed. The subordinate position of the sangha is designed to legitimize the monarchy and at the same time to eliminate potential threats from the sangha itself. Moreover, by consolidating elites, it helps to overcome external challenges (e.g., the threat of colonization that Thailand faced in the second half of the 19th century). In fact, there is a symbiosis between two types of legitimization – a traditional one and a charismatic one, where the latter is subordinated to the former. As a result, the sangha plays the role of a passive (disenfranchised) ally of the monarchy, Buddhist values have no serious influence on political processes, and Western economic models are quite organically integrated into Thai society. At present, however, this symbiosis poses a number of problems. First, it hinders the development of the sangha and Buddhist doctrine, which have difficulties in confronting alternative movements. Secondly, it undermines the authority of the monarchy itself, which is associated with archaic methods of governance and a corrupt and backward sangha hierarchy. Thirdly, it creates an alienation between the sangha and a large part of society, which perceives the sangha as an institution of the state rather than an independent force. Like other countries of the Theravada tradition, Thailand is the scene of a struggle between a conservative ideology, which assumes the rule of “good people”, and a democratic ideology, borrowed from the West. Both ideologies resonate in Thai society but have been discredited by elites pursuing their own selfish interests. Neither constitutional law nor political Buddhism has been able to offer a sustainable model of political power that takes into account both paradigms. The tensions inherent in Thai domestic politics are therefore likely to persist, at least in the short term.
About the author: Vladislav Tolstykh – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, Department of International Law, MGIMO of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia; Chief Researcher, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Tolstykh V. (2023) Politicheskoe znachenie buddizma i konstitutsionno-pravovoy status buddistskoy sangkhi v Tailande [Political significance of Buddhism and the constitutional and legal status of the Buddhist sangha in Thailand]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 122–146. (In Russian).
References
Androsov V.P. (ed.) (2020) Digkha-nikaya (Sobranie dlinnykh poucheniy) [Dīgha Nikāya (Collection of long discourses)], A.Ya.Syrkin (transl.), Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Ashin J., Crosby K. (2017) Heresy and Monastic Malpractice in the Buddhist Court Cases (Vinicchaya) of Modern Burma (Myanmar). Contemporary Buddhism, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 199–261.
Borchert Th., Darlington S.M. (2017–2018) Political Disrobing in Thailand. Buddhism, Law and Society, vol. 3, pp. 113–156.
Dhammahaso P.M.H. (2015) Trends of Monk Roles in Thai Politics in the Next Two Decades. The Chulalongkorn Journal of Buddhist Studies, vol. 9, pp. 13–58.
Dressel B. (2018) Thailand’s Traditional Trinity and the Rule of Law: Can They Coexist? Asian Studies Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 268–285.
Dubus A. (2018) Buddhism and Politics in Thailand, Bangkok: Institut de recherche sur l’Asie du Sud-Est contemporaine.
Dubus A. (2018) Polarization and Crisis in the Twenty-First Century. In: Dubus A. Buddhism and Politics in Thailand, Bangkok: Institut de recherche sur l’Asie du Sud-Est contemporaine, pp. 11–39.
Fomicheva E.A. (2014) Rol’ religii v obshchestvennoy zhizni i stanovlenii gosudarstvennosti v Tailande [The role of religion in public life and statehood in Thailand]. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual’nye problemy razvitiya, no. 25, pp. 69–88. (In Russian).
Fomicheva E.A. (2008) Tailand: vybory sostoyalis’ – krizis prodolzhaetsya. Pravitel’stvo Surayuta Chulanona – pravitel’stvo Samaka Suntkharaveta 2007 – nachalo 2008 gg. [Thailand: elections held – crisis continues. Surayut Chulanon’s government – Samak Sundaravej’s government 2007 – early 2008]. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual’nye problemy razvitiya, no. 11, pp. 277–296. (In Russian).
Harding A. (2007) Buddhism, Human Rights and Constitutional Reform in Thailand. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–25.
Kornev V.I. (1973) Tayskiy buddizm [Thai Buddhism], Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Krasnodembskaya N.G., Soboleva E.S. (2022) O khramovykh zavesakh na temu “Vessantara dzhataka” iz Tseylonskoy kollektsii MAE RAN № 6379 (k tolkovaniyu etnokul’turnogo smysla) [The Vessantara Jātaka Ceylon temple textiles from the MAE RAS collection no. 6379 (to the interpretation of their ethnocultural meaning)]. Kunstkamera, no. 4, pp. 104–115. (In Russian).
Kulabkaew K. (2019) The Politics of Thai Buddhism under the NCPO Junta, Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
Keyes Ch.F. (1999) Buddhism Fragmented: Thai Buddhism and Political Order Since the 1970s. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/25212072/BUDDHISM_FRAGMENTED_THAI_BUDDHISM_AND_POLITICAL_ORDER_SINCE_THE_1970S (accessed: 05.08.2023).
Larsson T. (2016) Keeping Monks in Their Place? Asian Journal of Law and Society, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–28.
Larsson T. (2022) Royal Succession and the Politics of Religious Purification in Contemporary Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 2–22.
McCargo D. (2005) Network Monarchy and Legitimacy Crises in Thailand. The Pacific Review, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 499–519.
Mérieau E. (2016) Thailand’s Deep State, Royal Power and the Constitutional Court (1997–2015). Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 445–466.
Na-rangsi S. (2002) Administration of the Thai Sangha: Past, Present and Future. The Chulalongkorn Journal of Buddhist Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–28.
Preechasinlapakun S. (2013) Dynamics and Institutionalization of Coups in the Thai Constitution. Available at: https://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Reports/Vrf/pdf/483.pdf (accessed: 05.08.2023).
Priprang Т. (2020) Politicheskiy rezhim Korolevstva Tailand v XXI v.: problemy institutsionalizatsii i funktsionirovaniya: Dis. … kand. polit. nauk [The political regime of the Kingdom of Thailand in the 21st century: problems of institutionalisation and functioning: Cand. in political sci. diss.], Ekaterinburg: Ural’skiy federal’nyy universitet. (In Russian).
Pugacheva E.V. (2012) Analiz prichin politicheskoy nestabil’nosti v sovremennom Tailande: Taksin Chinavat i tailandskaya demokratiya [Analysing the causes of political instability in contemporary Thailand: Thaksin Shinawatra and Thai democracy]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 13, no. 1, pp. 146–153. (In Russian).
Schonthal B. (2017–2018) Buddhist Legal Pluralism? Looking Again at Monastic Governance in Modern South and Southeast Asia. Buddhism, Law and Society, vol. 3, pp. vii–xxxvii.
Seeger M. (2010) Theravāda Buddhism and Human Rights. Perspectives from Thai Buddhism. In: Meinert C., Zöllner H.-B. (eds.) Buddhist Approaches to Human Rights. Dissonances and Resonances, Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, pp. 63–92.
Seeger M. (2022) The Fragmentary History of Female Monasticism in Thailand: Community Formation and Development of Monastic Rules by Thai Mae Chis. Religions, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1042–1073.
Siani E. (2019) Buddhism and Power. In: Chachavalpongpun P. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Thailand, Abington; New York: Routledge, pp. 268–277.
Tambiah S.J. (1976) World Conqueror and World Renouncer: A Study of Buddhism and Polity in Thailand against a Historical Background, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tuan N.A. et al. (2018) A Comparison on the Structure of Buddhist Sangha Administrative System Between Thailand and Vietnam. The Journal of International Association of Buddhist Universities, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 65–83.
Vorng S. (2010) Samsaric Salvation: Prosperity Cults, Political Crisis, and Middle Class Aspirations in Bangkok. MMG Working Paper 10-14, Göttingen: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity. Available at: https://www.mmg.mpg.de/59223/WP_10-14_Vorng_Samsaric-Salvation.pdf (accessed: 05.08.2023).