Available in Russian
Author: Alexander Blankenagel
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2018-5-42-64
Keywords: constitutional identity; eternity clauses; international law vs. national legal systems; psychological and sociological concepts of identity
Constitutional identity has grown to be a very popular concept among European constitutional courts in the last decade. National constitutional courts use it against an, what they see as, unsuitable intrusion of international law into their national legal orders, be it against EU law or be it against the European Convention on Human Rights as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights. A more thorough analysis shows that the notion of constitutional identity sometimes raises very basic questions often linked to constitutional identity clauses and sometimes just creates a non-transparent veil hiding the true reason of the respective decision. The analysis also shows that constitutional identity as a legal argument is redundant: Constitutions can cope with the problem of unsuitable intrusion of international law into the national legal order without resorting to some foggy constitutional identity. The European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights are confronted with the opposite problem: how much homogeneity, how much integration may they impose on their respective member states: This has little in common with constitutional identity as used by national constitutional courts. The reasoning of national constitutional courts with constitutional identity is doubtful for other reasons as well. The reference to “identity” – and consequently to constitutional identity – lures the addressee into the belief that this is a scientific and therefore irrefutable concept which implies the impossibility of change for a given social actor. Psychological and sociological theories of individual and collective identity, on the contrary, treat identity as the flexible and changeable result of interactions in which the self-perception of a social actor – be it an individual or a collective one – and the expectations of other social actors towards him/her are balanced into “his/her identity”. In any interaction identity will be agreed upon anew. Consequently, there are many and good reasons – for constitutional courts as well as for constitutional scholars – to refrain from the use of “constitutional identity” as a legal/constitutional concept.
About the author: Alexander Blankenagel – Professor in Public Law, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Citation: Blankenagel A. (2018) “Prizrak brodit po resheniyam evropeyskikh konstitutsionnykh sudov”: chto delat’ s konstitutsionnoy identichnost’yu? [“The ghost haunting decisions of European constitutional courts”: what to do with constitutional identity?] // Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 42–64.
References
Aranovskiy K., Knyazev S. (2016) Sootnoshenie konstitutsionnykh printsipov i mezhdunarodnykh standartov v kontekste rossiyskogo ugolovnogo pravosudiya [Correlation between constitutional principles and international standards in the context of Russian criminal justice]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no. 4, pp. 41–58. (In Russian).
Arnold R., Berger A. (2014) Art 17 (Anerkennung der Grundrechte). In: Wieser B. (ed.) Handbuch der russischen Verfassung, Wien: Verlag Österreich, pp. 171–175.
Berger P.L., Berger B., Keller H. (1975) Das Unbehagen in der Modernität, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Bergmann W. (1981) Die Zeitstrukturen sozialer Systeme, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Besselink L. (2010) National and Constitutional Identity before and after Lisbon. Utrecht Law Review, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 36–49.
Blankenagel A. (1987) Tradition und Verfassung: neue Verfassung und alte Geschichte in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Cohen A. (1979) Political Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 8, pp. 87–113.
Douglаs M. (1970) Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, London: Barrie & Rockliff the Cresset Press.
Dreier H. (ed.) (2008) Grundgesetz-Kommentar. Bd.3: Artikel 83–146, 2nd ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Eisenstadt N. (1973) Tradition, Wandel und Modernität, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Eriksen E.H. (1973) Identität und Lebenszyklus, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Etkind A. (2013) Warped Mourning. Stories of the Undead in the Land of the Unburied, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Firth R. (1973) Symbols: Public and Private, London: George Allen & Unwin.
Geertz C. (1975) Ideology, as a Cultural System. In: Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, London: Hutchinson, pp. 211–251.
Goffman E. (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Goffman E. (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goffman Е. (1990) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Penguin Books.
Habermas J. (1973) Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Habermas J. (1976) Können komplexe Gesellschaften eine vernünftige Identität ausbilden. In: Zur Rekonstruktion des historischen Materialismus, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Habermas J. (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Halbwachs M. (1967) Das kollektive Gedächtnis, Stuttgart: Enke.
Hartwig M. (2005) Much Ado About Human Rights: The Federal Constitutional Court Confronts the European Court of Human Rights. German Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 869–894.
Höfer R., Keupp H. (eds.) (1997) Identitätsforschung heute: Klassische und aktuelle Perspektiven der Identitätsforschung, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Ingold A. (2015) Die verfassungsrechtliche Identität der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Karriere – Konzept – Kritik. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 1–30.
Isaacs H.R. (1975) Idols of the Tribe: Group Identity and Political Change, New York: Harper and Row.
Ispolinov A. (2017) Prioritet prava Evropeyskogo Soyuza i natsional’naya (konstitutsionnaya) identichnost’ v resheniyah Suda ES i konstitutsionnykh sudov gosudarstv – chlenov ES [The priority of EU law and national (constitutional) identity in the decisions of the European Court of Justice and the constitutional courts of the EU member-states]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no. 4, pp. 47–68. (In Russian).
Jacobsohn G.J. (2010) Constitutional Identity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kluckhohn F.R. (1963) Some Reflectiоns on the Nature of Cultural Integration and Change. In: Tiryakian E.A. (ed.) Sociological Theory, Values and Sociological Change: Essays in Honor of Pitirim A. Sorokin, New York: Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 210–248.
Kottmann M., Wohlfahrt Ch. (2009) Der gespaltene Wächter? Demokratie, Verfassungsidentität und Integrationsverantwortung im Lissabon-Urteil. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, vol. 69, pp. 443–470.
Krappmann L. (2016) Soziologische Dimensionen der Identität: Strukturelle Bedingungen für die Teilnahme an Interaktionsprozessen, 12th ed., Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Ledeneva A.V. (2013) Can Russia Modernise?: Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lepsius O. (2015) Souveränität und Identität als Frage des Institutionen-Settings. Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart. Neue Folge, vol. 63, pp. 63–90.
Lübbe-Wolff G.L. (2006) ECHR and National Jurisdiction – The Görgülü-Case. Humboldt Forum Recht, no. 12, pp. 138–146.
Luhmann N. (1969) Moderne Systemtheorien als Form gesamtgesellschaftlicher Analyse. In: Habermas J., Luhmann N. Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie: was leistet die Systemforschung?, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, pp. 7–24.
Luhmann N. (1971) Die Weltgesellschaft. In: Luhmann N. Soziologische Aufklärung. Bd.2: Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft, 4th ed., Opladen: Westdeustscher Verlag, pp. 51–71.
Luhmann N. (1975) Legitimation durch Verfahren, 2nd ed., Darmstadt; Neuwied: Luchterhand.
Moore S.F., Myerhoff B.G. (1975) Symbols and Politics in Communal Ideology, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Parsons T. (1970) The Social System, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Parsons T. (1972) Culture and Social System Revisited. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 253–266.
Parsons T. (1972) Das System moderner Gesellschaften, München: Juventa.
Parsons Т. (1976) Der Begriff der Gesellschaft: Seine Elemente und Verknüpfungen. In: Parsons Т. Zur Theorie sozialer Systeme, S.Jensen (ed.), Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 121–160.
Pietrowicz M. (2010) Die Umsetzung der zu Art.6 Abs.1 EMRK ergangenen Urteile des EGMR in der Russischen Föderation, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
Polzin M. (2018) Verfassungsidentität. Ein normatives Konzept des Grundgesetzes?, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Preiswerk R. (1980) Kulturelle Identität, Self-Reliance und Grundbedürfnisse. Das Argument 120, vol. 22, pp. 167–178.
Pye L.W., Verba S. (1965) Political Culture and Political Development, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Saiz Arnaiz A., Alcoberro Llivina C. (eds.) (2013) National Constitutional Identity and European Integration, Cambridge: Intersentia Publishers.
Sajó A., Uitz R. (2017) The Constitution of Freedom. An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schönberger C. (2015) Identitäterä: Verfassungsidentität zwischen Widerstandsformel und Musealisierung des Grundgesetzes. Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart. Neue Folge, vol. 63, pp. 41–62.
Schweitzer M. (2008) Staatsrecht III: Staatsrecht, Völkerrecht, Europarecht, 9th ed., Karlsruhe: C.F.Müller.
Shils E. (1981) Tradition, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Thome H. (1981) Legitimitätstheorien und die Dynamik kollektiver Einstellungen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Tismaneanu V. (1995) Political Culture and Civil Society in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, Armonk, NY; London: M.E.Sharpe.
Tolz V. (2004) A Future Russia: A Nation-State or a Multi-National Federation. In: Slater W., Wilson A. (eds.) The Legacy of the Soviet Union, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–38.
Wallace A.F.C. (1980) Die Psychische Einheit Menschlicher Gruppen. In: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen (ed.) Alltagswissen: Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit, 5th ed., Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 285–322.
Wischmeyer T. (2015) Nationale Identität und Verfassungsidentität. Schutzgehalte, Instrumente, Perspektiven. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 415–460.
Zor’kin V.D. (2017) Konstitutsionnaya identichnost’ Rossii: doktrina i praktika: Doklad na VII Peterburgskom mezhdunarodnom yuridicheskom forume 16 maya 2017 goda [Constitutional identity of the Russian Federation: doctrine and practice: Report presented at VII Saint Petersburg International Legal Forum, 16 May 2017]. Available at: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/News/Speech/Pages/ViewItem.aspx?ParamId=82 (accessed: 11.10.2018). (In Russian).