Available in Russian
Authors: Aleksei Dolzhikov, Anna Vasilyeva
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2023-6-33-65
Keywords: administrative act; regulation; reason-giving; motivation; legitimate aim; wrong purpose; expediency; abuse of power; scientific validity; evidence in administrative proceedings; questions of law; questions of fact
Reason-giving, along with fairness, rationality, and good faith, is one of the ambiguous concepts. Depending on the concept of law and methodological framework, this term can mean different phenomena. For a legal formalist, this principle primarily refers to the normative foundations of legal instruments. When applying theory of argumentation, reason-giving pertains to the motives and persuasiveness of decision-making. Within the public administration approach, the relationship between goals and means in the decision-making comes to the fore, including their scientific justification and an evidence-based approach. Due to such diversity, it is necessary to clearly separate various meanings and aspects of reason-giving. At the same time, in traditional Russian administrative law scholarship, reason-giving is not distinguished from legality. In this article, the authors argue against the fallacy of such approaches, highlighting the distinct content and elements of reason-giving. The main author’s point is that this is the material principle, rather than formal criteria for reviewing administrative actions. There remains the possibility that the court conducts fact-finding in administrative litigation instead of the administrative body. Hence, it is important to evaluate critically the forms of interaction between courts and administration in the course of reviewing compliance with the principle of reason-giving. The article consists of five parts. The first part examines the history of reason-giving in key legal traditions. The second and third parts are devoted to the study of the formation of this principle in the Russian Empire and Soviet administrative law. Turning to the history of pre-revolutionary and Soviet administrative law provides continuity in the interpretation of the principle under consideration. The fourth and fifth parts analyze the existing approaches to the duty of reason-giving in the Anglo-American and Civil Law traditions of administrative law. It is argued that reason-giving is a general principle of law in key legal traditions. Comparative legal analysis is considered a methodological prerequisite for further research on this principle in Russian administrative law.
About the authors: Aleksei Dolzhikov – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Associate Professor of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Anna Vasilyeva – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, LL.M. (University of Passau), Associate Professor of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Citation: Dolzhikov A., Vasilyeva A. (2023) “Pochemu? Po kochanu!”: printsip obosnovannosti v administrativnom prave [“Why? The answer is a lemon!”: The principle of reason-giving in administrative law]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 33–65. (In Russian).
References
Alexy R. (2006) Sbalansirovannost’, konstitutsionnyy kontrol’ i predstavitel’stvo [Balancing, constitutional review, and representation]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 113–118. (In Russian).
Aquinas T. (2012) Summa teologii [Summa theologiae], vol. 4, N. Lobkovits, A.V. Appolonov (eds.), Moscow: Librokom. (In Russian).
Asimow M. (2015) Five Models of Administrative Adjudication. The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 3–31.
Autin J.-L. (2011) La motivation des actes administratifs unilatéraux, entre tradition nationale et évolution des droits européens. Revue française d’administration publique, vol. 137–138, no. 1–2, pp. 85–99.
Belyaev M.A. (2019) Deliberativnaya model’ demokratii: bazovye printsipy i problemy realizatsii [Deliberative model of democracy: basic principles and practical difficulties]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, no. 3, pp. 79–95. (In Russian).
Braibant G. (1988) Frantsuzskoe administrativnoe pravo [French administrative law], D.I.Vasil’ev, V.D. Karpovich (transl.), Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).
Broker L. (2018) Inkvizitsionnyy printsip v administrativnom prave (administrativnaya protsedura i administrativnyy protsess) [Inquisitional principle in administrative law (administrative procedure and administrative process)]. In: Ezhegodnik publichnogo prava 2018: Printsipy administrativnykh protsedur i administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva [Yearbook of public law 2018: Principles of administrative procedures and administrative proceedings], Moscow: Infotropik Media, pp. 11–27. (In Russian).
Cane P. (2021) An Anglo-American Tradition. In: Cane P., Hofmann H.C.H., Ip E.C., Lindseth P.L. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 2–21.
Craig P. (2013) The Nature of Reasonableness Review. Current Legal Problems, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 131–167.
Craig P.P. (1994) The Common Law, Reasons and Administrative Justice. The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 282–302.
Daly P. (2012) A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law: Basis, Application and Scope, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Denisov A.I. (ed.) (1940) Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik [Soviet administrative law: a textbook], Moscow: Yuridicheskoe izdatel’stvo Narodnogo komissariata yustitsii SSSR. (In Russian).
Dodin E.V. (1973) Dokazatel’stva v administrativnom protsesse [Evidence in administrative proceedings], Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russian).
Ebren H. (1901) Théorie du détournement de pouvoir: thèse de doctorat, Faculté de droit, Université de Lyon.
Ehlers D. (2022) Razvitie kodifitsirovannogo administrativno-protsedurnogo prava [Development of codified administrative procedural law]. In: Abramchik L.Ya., Shakaryan T.A. (eds.) Nemetskaya doktrina administrativnogo prava i stanovlenie instituta administrativnykh protsedur v stranakh Tsentral’noy Azii: materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, priurochennoy k 45-letiyu so dnya prinyatiya Zakona ob oformlenii protsedur v Germanii, g.Tashkent, 25 maya 2021 g. [The German doctrine of administrative law and the formation of the institution of administrative procedures in the countries of Central Asia: proceedings of the international conference dedicated to the 45th anniversary of the adoption of the Law on registration of procedures in Germany, Tashkent, May 25, 2021], Tashkent: Institut gosudarstva i prava Akademii nauk Respubliki Uzbekistan, pp. 66–90. (In Russian).
Elistratov A.I. (1917) Osnovnye nachala administrativnogo prava [Basics principles of administrative law], 2nd ed., Moscow: Izdanie G.A. Lemana i S.I. Sakharova. (In Russian).
Elistratov A.I. (1922) Ocherk administrativnogo prava: yuridicheskie stat’i [An essay on administrative law: legal articles], Moscow: Gosizdat (In Russian).
Gagen V.A. (1919) Uchebnik administrativnogo prava [A textbook of administrative law], Rostov-on-Don: Tipografiya Tovarishchestva S.S. Sivozhelezov i Ko. (In Russian).
Goodwin J. (2012) The Last Defence of Wednesbury. Public Law, no. 3, pp. 445–467.
Grey J.H. (1979) Discretion in Administrative Law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 107–132.
Hauriou M. (1914) Précis de droit administratif et de droit public, 8 ed., Paris: L. Larose et L. Tenin.
Jackson J.D. (2011) Putting Rationality Back into the Rational Basis Test: Saving Substantive Due Process and Redeeming the Promise of the Ninth Amendment. University of Richmond Law Review, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 491–548.
Jowett B. (ed.) (1885) The Politics of Aristotle, vol. 1, B. Jowett (transl.), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Karadzhe-Iskrov N.P. (1946) Nedeystvitel’nyy administrativnyy akt i predely ego obyazatel’nosti dlya suda [Invalid administrative act and the limits of its binding for the court]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no. 5–6, pp. 73–75. (In Russian).
Koenig Ch. (1992) Der Begründungszwang in mehrpoligen Verwaltungsrechtsverhältnissen am Beispiel umweltrelevanter Entscheidungen. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 513–542.
Kononov A.L. (2001) Ob obshchikh printsipakh prava vo frantsuzskoy i bel’giyskoy sudebnoy praktike po administrativnym delam [On general principles of law in French and Belgian judicial practice in administrative cases]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, no. 3, pp. 82–86. (In Russian).
Kopp F.O., Ramsauer U. (eds.) (2000) Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz: Kommentar, 7th ed., München: C.H. Beck.
Le Sueur A., Herberg J., English R. (1999) Principles of Public Law, 2nd ed., London: Cavendish.
Lindner J.F., Jahr D. (2013) Der unzureichend begründete Verwaltungsakt. Das Verhältnis der §§ 39, 40, 45 VwVfG zu §114 S.2 VwGO. Juristische Schulung [JuS]-Extra, pp. 3–5.
Lunev A.E., Piskotin M.I., Yampol’skaya Ts.A. (eds.) (1968) Nauchnye osnovy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v SSSR [Scientific foundations of public administration in the USSR], Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Marat J.-P. (1956) [1789] Konstitutsiya ili proekt Deklaratsii prav cheloveka i grazhdanina s posleduyushchim planom spravedlivoy, mudroy i svobodnoy konstitutsii, napisannoy avtorom “Dara otechestvu” [Constitution or a draft of the Declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen, followed by a plan for a just, wise and free constitution, written by the author of “Gift to the fatherland”]. In: Marat J.-P. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Tom 2 [Selected works. Vol.2], in 3 vosl., S.B. Kan (transl.), Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, pp. 7–278. (In Russian).
Mashaw J.L. (2018) Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: Reflections on an American Hybrid. In: Levy R., Kong H., Orr G., King J. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–27.
Mashaw J.L. (2018) Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy: How Administrative Law Supports Democratic Government, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Maurer H., Waldhoff Ch. (2017) Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, München: C.H.Beck.
Mayer O. (1914) Besprechung zu: Gaston Jeze, Das Verwaltungsrecht der Französischen Republik. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, vol. 32, pp. 275–279.
Mestre J.-L. (2021) France: The Vicissitudes of a Tradition. In: Cane P., Hofmann H.C.H., Ip E.C., Lindseth P.L. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 22–51.
Neill P. (ed.) (1988) Administrative Justice: Some Necessary Reforms (Report of the Committee of the Justice – All Souls Review of Administrative Law in the United Kingdom), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nersesyants V.S. (1983) Pravo i zakon: Iz istorii pravovykh ucheniy [Law and lex. From the history of legal doctrines], Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Novoselov V.I. (1968) Zakonnost’ aktov organov upravleniya [Legality of acts of governing bodies], Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russian).
Peiris G.L. (1987) Wednesbury Unreasonableness: The Expanding Canvas. The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 53–82.
Pokrovskiy S.P. (1914) Prevyshenie vlasti vo frantsuzskom administrativnom prave i ego otlichie ot zloupotrebleniya vlast’yu [Excess of power in French administrative law and its difference from abuse of power]. Yuridicheskie zapiski, izdavaemye Demidovskim Yuridicheskim Litseem, no. I–II (XIX–XX), pp. 271–298. (In Russian).
Rozhdestvenskiy N.F. (1840) Osnovaniya gosudarstvennogo blagoustroystva, s primeneniem k rossiyskim zakonam [Foundations of state improvement, with application to Russian laws], Saint Petersburg: Tipografiya N. Grecha. (In Russian).
Schoch F. (2004) Abschied vom Polizeirecht des liberalen Rechtsstaats? Vom Kreuzberg-Urteil des Preußischen Oberverwaltungsgerichts zu den Terrorismusbekämpfungsgesetzen unserer Tage. Der Staat, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 347–369.
Sherstoboev O.N. (2017) Administrativnaya diskretsiya i printsip razumnosti (chast’ 1: zarubezhnyy opyt) [Administrative law and principle of reasonableness (part 1: foreign experience)]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, no. 4, pp. 151–161. (In Russian).
Solomon P.H., Jr. (2003) Sudebnaya vlast’ v Rossii: skvoz’ prizmu administrativnoy yustitsii [Judicial power in Russia: through the prism of administrative justice]. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 108–124. (In Russian).
Sommermann K.-P. (2021) The Germanic Tradition of Comparative Administrative Law. In: Cane P., Hofmann H.C.H., Ip E.C., Lindseth P.L. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–77.
Stolleis M. (2014) Entstehung des Allgemeinen Teils des Verwaltungsrechts (1850–1900). Juridica International, vol. 21, pp. 21–28.
Studenikin S.S. et al. (1950) Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik [Soviet administrative law: a textbook], 2nd ed., Moscow: Gosyurizdat. (In Russian).
Talapina E.V. (2016) Teoriya administrativnykh aktov: k proektu zakona o gosudarstvennom upravlenii [Theory of administrative acts: about a law draft on the state government]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, no. 9, pp. 84–89. (In Russian).
Tarasov I.T. (1888) Kratkiy ocherk nauki administrativnogo prava [Short essay of the science of administrative law], vol. 1, Yaroslavl: Tipo-litografiya G. Fal’k. (In Russian).
Taylor G.D.S. (1976) Judicial Review of Improper Purposes and Irrelevant Considerations. The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 272–291.
Untermaier-Kerléo É. (2019) La motivation des décisions réglementaires et d’espèce en droit administratif français. Cahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentaux, no. 17, pp. 21–30.
Vinnitskiy A.V. (2019) Uchenie o sub’ektivnykh publichnykh pravakh vs “gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskogo podkhoda” v nauke [The doctrine of subjective public rights vs “public management approach” in science]. Pravo i politika, no. 12, pp. 27–40. (In Russian).
Welter H. (1929) Le contrôle juridictionnel de la moralité administrative: étude de doctrine et de jurisprudence: thèse de doctorat, Faculté de droit, Université de Nancy.
Wolff H.J., Bachof O., Stober R., Kluth W. (2017) Verwaltungsrecht I: Ein Studienbuch, 13th ed., München: C.H. Beck.
Yakovlev N.N. (ed.) (1994) Federalist: Politicheskie esse A. Gamil’tona, Dzh. Medisona i Dzh. Dzheya [Federalist: Political essays of A. Hamilton, J. Madison and J. Jay], N.N. Yakovlev (transl.), Moscow: Progress; Litera. (In Russian).
Yusupov V.A. (1974) Problemy obosnovaniya resheniy organov gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Problems of substantiating decisions of government bodies]. In: Kozlov Yu.M. (ed.) Upravlenie i pravo
[Public administration and law], Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, pp. 131–137. (In Russian).
Yusupov V.A. (1975) Obosnovanie resheniy organov sovetskogo gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: materialy vesesoyuznoy nauchnoy konferentsii, 21–23 noyabrya 1973 g. [Justification of decisions of Soviet government bodies: proceedings of all-union scientific conference, November 21–23, 2023]. In: Ivanov G.D. et al. (eds.) Demokratiya i pravo razvitogo sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva [Democracy and law of a developed socialist society], Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, pp. 192–194. (In Russian).