Available in Russian
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2025-1-21-36
Author: Alexander Salenko
Keywords: German Basic Law; constitutional values; constitutional state; eternal constitutional guarantees; Ewigkeitsgarantie; protection of the constitution; constitutional design; federalism; human rights and freedoms; Federal Constitutional Court; Germany
In 2024, the Basic Law of Germany (Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland) turned 75 years old. Originally conceived as a temporary constitutional document, the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany has evolved over the years into a permanent constitution of the modern unified German state. The author sees his main task in the analysing of the current Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany and the identifying of the unique features of German constitutional design. The most important qualitative characteristic of the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany is the presence of immutable constitutional values, which are protected by the mechanism of eternal guarantees (Ewigkeitsklausel or Ewigkeitsgarantie), preventing both the change and revision of the constitutional text regarding the federal structure of Germany, regarding participation of the German Federal States (Bundesländer) in the federal legislative process, as well as constitutional norms on the supreme value of human rights and freedoms, and on the inviolability of human dignity (Menschenwürdekern), which, in essence, has a gravitational character in relation to all other constitutional rights and freedoms of a human and citizen. The author intentionally focuses on studying the content of the German constitutional concept of a modern democratic state capable of self-defense against the enemies of democracy (Konzeption der „wehrhaften Demokratie“), as well as on studying the role of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, which, within the German legal system, both de jure and de facto performs the function of guarantor of the constitution. The author comes to the conclusion that a minimum set of constitutional mechanisms that protect the Basic Law of the state from constitutionally hostile actions (namely, the immutable constitutional values and their eternal guarantees) will also be useful for the evolutionary development of the Russian Federation as a democratic and legal state.
About the author: Alexander Salenko – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Master of Laws (LL.M., Göttingen), Professor, Higher School of Law, Institute of Management and Territorial Development, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia.
Citation:
Salenko A. (2025) Nemetskiy konstitutsionnyy dizayn: Osnovnomu zakonu Germanii — 75 let [German constitutional design: Germany’s Basic Law turns 75]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.34, no.1, pp.21–36. (In Russian).
References
Alebastrova I.A. (2021) Konstitutsionnye popravki — 2020: naskol'ko izmenilsya konstitutsionnyy dizayn? [Constitutional amendments — 2020: how much has the constitutional design changed?]. In: Derzhavinskie chteniya: Sbornik statey XVI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Kazan', 23–26 maya 2021 goda [Derzhavin readings: collection of articles of the XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference, Kazan, May 23–26, 2021], Moscow: Vserossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet yustitsii (RPA Minyusta Rossii), pp.639–643. (In Russian).
Bartsits I.N. (2018) Konstitutsionnyy dizayn (o krasote i estetike konstitutsiy) [Constitutional design (on the beauty and aesthetics of constitutions)]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki, no.41, pp.344–370. (In Russian).
Blankenagel A. (2009) Osnovnoy zakon — skuchnaya istoriya uspekha? [The Basic Law. Boring success story?]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.18, no.3, pp.58–59. (In Russian).
Braun S. (2003) Tierschutz in der Verfassung — und was nun? Die Bedeutung des neuen Art.20a GG. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, vol.56, no.12, pp.488–493.
Calliess C. (2001) Rechtsstaat und Umweltstaat: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Grundrechtsdogmatik im Rahmen mehrpoliger Verfassung, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Dulich L.M. (2018) Osobennosti konstitutsionnogo razvitiya Germanii [Features of the constitutional development in Germany]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskoy yuridicheskoy akademii, no.4, pp.15–18. (In Russian).
Feldkamp M.F. (2008) Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949: Die Entstehung des Grundgesetzes, Bonn: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Geimbukh N.G. (2021) Konstitutsionno-pravovye diskussii pri prinyatii Osnovnogo zakona FRG 1949 goda [Constitutional and legal discussions during the adoption of the Basic Law of the FRG of 1949]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo, no.41, pp.29–37. (In Russian).
Gröpl C. (2024) Staatsrecht I. Staatsgrundlagen, Staatsorganisation, Verfassungsprozess: mit der Einführung in das juristische Lernen, 16th ed., München: C.H.Beck.
Hannappel N. (2024) Widerspruch unerwünscht! Zum Umgang des Bundesverfassungsgerichts mit Konflikten zwischen einfachem Bundes- und Landesrecht. In: Lukosek S., Schlüter A. (eds.) Linien der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts: erörtert von den wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern, vol.7, Berlin; Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp.1–24.
Ivanchuk D.V. (2015) Istoriya razrabotki i prinyatiya Osnovnogo zakona (Konstitutsii) FRG (1949) [History of the development and enactment of the Basic Law (Constitution) for the Federal Republic of Germany (1949)]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no.7, pp.88–94. (In Russian).
Kalashnikova T.A. (2018) Prava i svobody cheloveka i grazhdanina v Konstitutsii RF i v Osnovnom zakone FRG (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) [Rights and freedoms of human and citizen in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and in the principal law of the FRG (comparative-legal analysis)]. Rostovskiy nauchnyy zhurnal, no.2, pp.71–77. (In Russian).
Kloepfer M. (2011) Verfassungsrecht. Bd.I: Grundlagen, Staatsorganisationsrecht, Bezüge zum Völker- und Europarecht, München: C.H.Beck.
Kravets I.A. (2021) “Homo dignus”, pravovoe polozhenie lichnosti i sovremennyy konstitutsionalizm (rossiyskiy, sravnitel'nyy i mezhdunarodnyy kontekst) [“Homo dignus”, the legal status of the individual and modern constitutionalism (Russian, comparative and international context)]. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, no.5, pp.621–635. (In Russian).
Künast R. (2009) Am Anfang steht die Menschenwürde: Ein Grundgesetz für das 21. Jahrhundert. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, no.24, pp.1723–1727.
Leybo Yu.I. (2019) Konstitutsionnoe zakreplenie osnovnykh prav v Federativnoy Respublike Germanii [Constitutional regulation of fundamental rights in the Federal Republic of Germany]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.1, pp.40–53. (In Russian).
Leksin I.V. (2009) Evolyutsiya territorial'nogo ustroystva Germanii posle Vtoroy mirovoy voyny [Evolution of territorial organization of Germany after World War II]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.4, pp.85–94. (In Russian).
Maatsch A. (2011) Die Annahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde zur Entscheidung. In: Emmenegger S., Wiedmann A. (eds.) Linien der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgericht — erörtert von den wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeitern, vol.2, Berlin; Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp.31–52.
Manssen G. (2024) Staatsrecht II: Grundrechte, 20th ed., München: C.H.Beck.
Nussberger A. (2023) Novye konstitutsionnye prava v Osnovnom zakone Germanii [New constitutional rights of the German Basic Law]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.32, no.5, pp.51–57. (In Russian).
Papier H.-J. (2020) „Erfolgsgeschichte“?! — Das Grundgesetz im Wandel der Zeit. In: Lüdicke L. (ed.) Deutschland in bester Verfassung? 70 Jahre Grundgesetz, Berlin: Bebra-Wissenschaft, pp.51–60.
Papier H.-J. (2009) Verhältnis des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zu den Fachgerichtsbarkeiten. Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt, no.8, pp.473–481.
Sachs M. (2016) Verfassungsprozessrecht, 4th ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Salenko A.V. (2020) Konstitutsionnaya reforma — 2020 i sudebnaya vlast': problemy nezavisimosti i samostoyatel'nosti [The Russian constitutional reform 2020 and judicial power: independence and autonomy]. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya, no.3, pp.188–211. (In Russian).
Salikov M.S. (2018) Federativnyy stroy Rossii: ponyatie i soderzhanie [Federal structure of Russia: definition and content]. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no.1, pp.53–61. (In Russian).
Sazin S.T. (2015) Konstitutsionnye prava i svobody cheloveka i grazhdanina v Konstitutsii RF i v Osnovnom zakone FRG (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz) [Constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen in the RF Constitution and the Fundamental Law of the FRG (comparative-law analysis)]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, no.6, pp.34–36. (In Russian).
Schink A. (1997) Umweltschutz als Staatsziel. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, vol.50, no.6, pp.221–229.
Schlaich K., Korioth S. (2021) Das Bundesverfassungsgericht. Stellung, Verfahren, Entscheidungen, 12th ed., München: C.H.Beck.
Steiner U. (2009) Osnovnomu zakonu Federativnoy Respubliki Germanii 60 let [60 years of the Basic Law of Germany]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.18, no.3, pp.83–94. (In Russian).