Available in Russian
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2025-1-62-94
Author: Igor Pibaev
Keywords: religious ministers; clergy; government funding; tax benefits; church tax, agreements, pensions
The article deals with the complex and somewhat mythologized topic of financial and social security of religious ministers. The author uses legislation and law enforcement practice of 58 countries as the normative basis of the research, which determine the current regimes of direct and indirect state financing (or lack thereof) of the activities of religious ministers. The author uses the comparative legal method and the method of systematization, as well as methods of legal formalism and concrete historical analysis. This review of existing legislative approaches has made it possible to identify five models (variations) of budget allocations to financially support religious ministers. The first model entails constitutional or legislative direct state funding for religious ministers of only one or several denominations. This model is typical for countries that previously had a state religion. The second one obliges the state to reduce budget revenues by giving its citizens the opportunity to dispose of part of the income tax in favor of religious organizations, which becomes the financial support for religious ministers. The third model is related to the existence of a special church tax levied by some religious communities from their members along with income tax. In the fourth model, indirect financing in the form of tax benefits is provided directly to religious ministers (for example, the “synergy housing allowance”, which is a housing allowance for clergy in the United States), or to a religious denomination by giving it a special tax status. The fifth model reinforces the lack of state funding for the activities of religious ministers, which means, as a result, that donations become the main source of income of the clergy. It is noted that despite the differentiation of legal regimes, most countries of the European Union adhere to a participatory approach, including the adoption of measures supporting religious associations and their ministers: direct or indirect payment of salaries to religious ministers, full or partial social and medical insurance, and, as a result, pension provision. In conclusion, the author provides several directions for the development of state-confessional relations in the issue of state financial support for religious ministers.
About the author: Igor Pibaev – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of State Legal Disciplines of Volga-Vyatka Institute (branch) of Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Kirov, Russia.
Citation:
Pibaev I. (2025) Gosudarstvennoe finansirovanie religioznykh sluzhiteley: modeli i perspektivy ikh razvitiya [State funding of religious ministers: existing models and prospects for their development]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.34, no.1, pp.62–94. (In Russian).
References
Agafonova A.A. (2012) Byudzhetnoe finansirovanie deyatel'nosti religioznykh ob'edineniy: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie [Budgetary financing of activity of religious associations: comparative-law research]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, no.3, pp.3–6. (In Russian).
Adriansén C.V. (2014) Religion and the Secular State in Peru. In: Religion and the Secular State: National Reports: issued for the occasion of The XVIIIth International Congress of Comparative Law, Washington, D.C., July 2010, Madrid: Complutense Universidad de Madrid, pp.549–557.
Bolgiani I. (ed.) (2009) La Chiesa Cattolica in Italia: Normativa pattizia, Milano: Giuffrè.
Bratić V. (2020). Financiranje vjerskih zajednica sredstvima državnog proračuna: primjer Hrvatske [Financing of the religious communities from the state budget: case of Croatia]. Ekonomski pregled, vol.71, no.3, pp.215–238. (In Croatian).
Chaykovskaya L.A., Oparina S.I. (2013) Finansirovanie i nalogooblozhenie religioznykh konfessiy v svetskom gosudarstve [Financing and taxation of religious denominations in a secular state]. Daydzhest-finansy, no.4, pp.41–45. (In Russian).
Cherkasov K.V., Ivanova O.S., Chalykh I.S. (2021) Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka religioznykh ob'edineniy v sovremennom svetskom gosudarstve: zarubezhnyy opyt pravovogo regulirovaniya i pravoprimeneniya [State support of religious associations in the modern secular state: foreign experience of legal regulation and law enforcement]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no.462, pp.256–268. (In Russian).
Friedman D., Leeson P., Skarbek D. (2024) Pravovye sistemy, sil'no nepohozhie na nashu [Legal systems very different from ours], Moscow: Sotsium. (In Russian).
Gajdenko P.I. (2023) Kruglyy stol “Dukhovenstvo XI–XXI vv. v obshchestve i gosudarstve: kanonicheskoe i pravovoe polozhenie” [Round table “Clergy of the XI–XXI centuries in society and state: canonical and legal position”]. Khristianskoe chtenie, no.2, pp.112–133. (In Russian).
Isaeva A.A. (2020) Federalizm i gosudarstvenno-konfessional'nye otnosheniya: na primere Germanii i Rossii [Federalism and state-confessional relations: the example of Germany and Russia]. Vestnik Sibirskogo juridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, no.2, pp.72–79. (In Russian).
Komyagin D.L. (2015) Imushchestvo i dokhody religioznykh organizatsiy — publichnye ili chastnye? [Property and income of religious institutions: public or private?]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no.4, pp.17–33. (In Russian).
Kravets I.A. (2003) Rossiyskaya Konstitutsiya i konstitutsionalizatsiya pravovogo poryadka (nekotorye voprosy teorii i praktiki) [Russian Constitution and constitutionalization of the legal order (some issues of theory and practice)]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no.11, pp.113–124. (In Russian).
Linkin V.N. (2015) Zloupotreblenie pravom religioznymi ob'edineniyami v oblasti nalogooblozheniya [Abuse of tax rights by religious associations]. Teoriya i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitiya, no.22, pp.79–81. (In Russian).
Minnerath R. (2015) Le concordat de Bonaparte et son actualité. Napoleonica. La Revue, no.2, pp.4–20.
Pibaev I.A. (2021) Konstitutsionno-pravovoy status svetskogo gosudarstva v Rossii i Italii: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie [Constitutional and legal status of a secular state in Russia and Italy: comparative legal research], Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).
Pibaev I. (2022) Akkreditatsiya deyatel'nosti svyashchennosluzhiteley kak mekhanizm protivodeystviya religiozno-ekstremistskoy ideologii: svoi sredi chuzhikh ili chuzhie sredi svoikh? [Accreditation of the activities of ministers as a mechanism for counteracting religious extremist ideology: friends amidst foes or foes amidst friends?]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.31, no.1, pp.108–135. (In Russian).
Ponkin I.V. (2004) O tipologii svetskikh gosudarstv [On the typology of secular states]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba, no.1, pp.96–101. (In Russian).
Torfs R. (2001) Church Autonomy in Belgium. In: Robbers G. (ed.) Church Autonomy: A Comparative Survey, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Available at: https://original.religlaw.org/common/document.view.php?docId=3862 (accessed: 14.02.2025).