Available in Russian
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2025-1-37-61
Author: Igor Kravets
Keywords: citizens’ assemblies; democratic constitutionalism; popular constitutionalism; deliberative constitutionalism; citizen participation; popular sovereignty; deliberative systems; citizens’ constitution
The article discusses the conceptual foundations and practice of incorporation of deliberative theory and deliberative institutions into the sphere of public law and constitutional law in the process of using various forms of citizens’ participation in making constitutional changes. The author reveals scholarly views on the interaction of the public sphere and constitutional democratic innovations, the international discussion on the nature and significance of democratic innovations, on the one hand, and the relationship between popular sovereignty and populism, their impact on the process of democratic participation and the promotion of the rule of law, on the other hand. In the countries of the New and Old Worlds, in the global South and in the countries of the European continent, institutions of popular participation, citizen involvement through assemblies and other forms of participation are actively used and find partial constitutional or legislative consolidation. The article examines the nature and specificity of primary citizens’ assemblies, the significance of Cabildo Abierto in Latin American countries, the experience of constitutionalization and legal regulation of modern forms of democratic participation in constitutional changes in South Africa, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil, the influence of digitalization processes on the Brazilian system of citizen engagement and participation infrastructure based on parliamentary-type digital platforms. The author draws attention to the significance of the European model of deliberative creation of constitutions, citizens’ assemblies and other forms of collective participation in constitutional changes and public initiatives. The study notes that in comparative constitutional experience and in normative regulation, citizens’ assemblies and constitutional conventions are used to consolidate and express constituent power. This generative power as a social phenomenon is manifested in the processes of public and political mobilization. The mobilization nature of constituent power can have several ways of implementation: 1) self-mobilization or partial self-mobilization; 2) engaging public and legal mobilization, 3) forced mobilization by public authorities of artists (for example, theater and cinema), scientists and public figures. The article uses deliberative and epistemological approaches, methods of formal-legal, concrete-historical, comparative constitutional and complex analysis.
About the author: Igor Kravets – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law, Principal Researcher, Institute for the Philosophy and Law, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia .
Citation:
Kravets I. (2025) Institut assambley grazhdan, Cabildo Abierto i deliberativnoe uchastie v sovremennykh gosudarstvakh [The institution of citizens’ assemblies, Cabildo Abierto and deliberative participation in modern states]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.34, no.1, pp.37–61. (In Russian).
References
(2020) Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/innovative-citizen-participation-and-new-democratic-institutions_339306da-en.html (accessed: 19.01.2025).
(2022) Open Government Review of Brazil: Towards an Integrated Open Government Agenda, OECD Public Governance Reviews, 21 June. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/open-government-review-of-brazil_3f9009d4-en (accessed: 19.01.2025).
Adamidis V. (2024) Democracy, Populism, and the Rule of Law: A Reconsideration of Their Interconnectedness. Politics, vol.44, no.3, pp.386–399.
Alvarado A. (2018) The Brazilian Constitution of 1988: A Comparative Appraisal. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, vol.5, no.3, pp.137–148.
Brewer-Carías A.R. (2013) El Constitucionalismo Hispano Americano Pre-Gaditano 1811–1812, Caracas: Editorial Jurídica Venezolana.
Caluwaerts D., Reuchamps M. (2018) The Legitimacy of Citizen-led Deliberative Democracy: the G1000 in Belgium, Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
Cameron M.A., Hershberg E., Sharpe K. (eds.) (2012) New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Coelho I.R., Larangeira A., Moraes S.D.T.A., Messetti P.A.S., Silva A.P. (2023) Democratic formation of the constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988 (CRFB/1988). Journal of Human Growth and Development, vol.33, no.1, pp.129–138.
Collier R.B. (2021) Prologue: Reflections on Two Episodes of Popular Inclusion. Structuring and Restructuring Arenas of Participation. In: Kapiszewski D., Levitsky S., Yashar D.J. (eds.) The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. XXV–XLVIII.
Colón-Ríos J. (2020) Constituent Power and the Law, New York: Oxford University Press.
Contiades X., Fotiadou A. (2017) Introduction. Participatory Constitutional Change. In: Contiades X., Fotiadou A. (eds.) Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution, Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp.1–6.
Costa A.B., Marques M.H.S. (2018) O processo constituinte de 1987 e a passagem do tempo: Uma análise sobre um conflito. Revista Direito e Práxis, vol.9, no.3, pp.1169–1195.
Elstub S., Ercan S.A., Mendonça R.F. (2016) The Fourth Generation of Deliberative Democracy. Critical Policy Studies, vol.10, no.2, pp.139–151.
Fung A. (2007) Minipublics: Deliberative Designs and Their Consequences. In: Rosenberg S.W. (ed.) Deliberation, Participation and Democracy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.159–183.
García-Guitián E. (2024). The Meanings of Deliberation and Citizen Participation. Representing the Citizens in Constitution-Making Processes. In: Reuchamps M., Welp Y. (eds.) Deliberative Constitution-Making: Opportunities and Challenges, Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp.17–28.
Goldfrank B. (2021) Inclusion Without Power? Limits of Participatory Institutions. In: Kapiszewski D., Levitsky S., Yashar D.J. (eds.) The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 117–154.
Habermas J. (1995) On the Internal Relation between the Rule of Law and Democracy. European Journal of Philosophy, vol.3, no.1, pp.12–20.
Hawkins K.A. (2010) Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kapiszewski D., Levitsky S., Yashar D.J. (2021) Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America. In: Kapiszewski D., Levitsky S., Yashar D.J. (eds.) The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–56.
Kravets I.A. (2024) Mobilizatsionnyy demokraticheskiy konstitutsionalizm i konstitutsionnye izmeneniya: teoreticheskie, rossiyskie i sravnitel'nye aspekty [Mobilization democratic constitutionalism and constitutional changes: theoretical, Russian and comparative aspects]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, no.6, pp.3–10. (In Russian).
Kravets I.A. (2024) Strategicheskiy konstitutsionalizm i konstitutsionnaya kommunikatsiya: teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie, pravovye i informatsionnye aspekty [Strategic constitutionalism and constitutional communication: theoretical and methodological, legal and informational aspects]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no.4, pp.5–22. (In Russian).
Landemore H., Fourniau J.-M. (2022) Citizens’ Assemblies, a New Form of Democratic Representation? Participations, no.34, pp.5–36.
Lynch J. (2012) New Worlds: A Religious History of Latin America, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mansbridge J. (2007) “Deliberative Democracy” or “Democratic Deliberation”? In: Rosenberg S.W. (ed.) Deliberation, Participation and Democracy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.251–271.
Mayka L., Rich J.A.J. (2021) Brazil’s Participatory Infrastructure: Opportunities and Limitations for Inclusion. In: Kapiszewski D., Levitsky S., Yashar D.J. (eds.) The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.155–182.
McDonald D. (2022) Making the “Citizen Constitution”: Popular Participation in the Brazilian Transition to Democracy, 1985–1988. The Americas, vol.79, no.4, pp.619–652.
Mejia M. (2022) Putting Citizens First: Participation and Open Government in Brazil. Participo. Research & Practice of Innovative Citizen Participation, 24 November. Available at: https://medium.com/participo/putting-citizens-first-participation-and-open-government-in-brazil-b180e11a95e1 (accessed: 19.01.2025).
De Miranda F. (1959) Textos sobre la Independencia, Caracas: Biblioteca de la Academia Nacional de la Historia.
Mossberg E.Yu. (2024) Deliberativnyy konstitutsionalizm v stranakh Benilyuksa [Deliberative constitutionalism in the Benelux countries]. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, no.6, pp.21–25. (In Russian).
Negri A. (2002) Il potere costituente. Saggio sulle alternative del moderno, Roma: Manifestolibri.
Parkinson J.R. (2012) Democracy and Public Space: The Physical Sites of Democratic Performance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parkinson J., Mansbridge J. (eds.) (2012) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson W.W. (1922) Some Reflections on the Cabildo as an Institution. The Hispanic American Historical Review, vol.5, no.4, pp.573–596.
Polotskiy S. (2013) Rifmologion: Sobranie pridvorno-tseremonial'nykh stikhov. Tom 1 [Rhymology: Collection of court and ceremonial poems. Vol.1], Wien; Köln; Weimar: Böhlau. (In Russian).
Shtatina M.A. (2000) Razdelenie vlastey po Konstitutsii Venesuely 1999 g. Federal'naya vlast' i vlast' shtatov, zakonodatel'naya i ispolnitel'naya vlast' [Division of authorities under the Constitution of Venezuela of 1999. Federal authority and authority of states, legislative and executive authority]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, no.2, pp.97–102. (In Russian).
Smith G. (2009) Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sorokina E. (2023) Sudebnyy aktivizm v praktike Konstitutsionnogo suda Yuzhno-Afrikanskoy Respubliki [Judicial activism of the Constitutional Court of South Africa]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.32, no.5, pp.103–123. (In Russian).
Suiter J, Reuchamps M. (2016) A Constitutional Turn for Deliberative Democracy in Europe? In: Suiter J., Reuchamps M. (eds.) Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp.1–13.
Vasilieva T. (2023) Kraudsorsingovye platformy v parlamentakh Chili i Brazilii: popytki deliberatsii [Crowdsourcing platforms in the Parliaments of Chile and Brazil: new approaches to deliberation]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.32, no.5, pp.124–141. (In Russian).
Vrydagh J. (2023) Citizens’ Assemblies: An Introduction. In: Reuchamps M., Vrydagh J., Welp Y. (eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, Berlin; Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp.1–18.
Welp Y. (2023) Citizens’ Assemblies: Beyond Utopian and Dystopian Approaches. In: Reuchamps M., Vrydagh J., Welp Y. (eds.) De Gruyter Handbook of Citizens’ Assemblies, Berlin; Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp.391–406.
Zinny A. (1920) Historia de los Gobernadores de las Provincias Argentinas. Vol.I, Buenos Aires: Administración General, “Vaccaro”, 1920.