Available in Russian
Author: Andrey Medushevsky
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2026-1-53-77
Keywords: T. G. Morshchakova; Constitutional Court of Russia; constitutional crisis of 1993; judiciary; judicial reform; independence of judges; hard cases; political and legal compromise; inner conviction of a judge; legal ethics.
Judges should be independent of politics, yet they are constantly ensnared by it. Politics haunts judges even where the full scope of constitutional guarantees for the separation of powers and an independent judiciary is in place, infiltrating the courtroom through variable interpretations of the values, principles, and norms of the constitution, the selection of arguments, and the assessment of facts in a particular case. It exerts a powerful, invisible influence through the ideological and moral beliefs of the judiciary, the organization of the judiciary, the cognitive and informational processes involved in formulating legal positions, and the determination of judges’ motivations when rendering specific decisions. This political component of judicial decisions is particularly heightened in times of constitutional crisis, when the old constitution loses its legitimacy and a new one is not adopted, the branches of government cannot reach a consensus on the fundamental principles, and the judicial community itself becomes divided in its interpretation of ways out of the crisis. In conditions of a legal vacuum or a conflict of norms in so-called difficult cases (denoting the alternative nature of possible legal positions with opposing political choices), the determining factor in a court decision becomes not so much a legal choice as an ethical choice from the standpoint of a legal ideal — a judge’s inner moral conviction and their willingness to defend this conviction despite powerful pressure from society, the state, or certain elite groups in a constant struggle for power. This choice becomes even more dramatic in the case of an authoritarian transformation of power, demonstrating the ultimate conflict between dependence and independence — accepting pressure or refusing it, even to the point of resignation. It is precisely this ability of the court to uphold its legal position — to say no to the legislature and other branches of government — that determines the concept of judicial independence and, ultimately, the fate of the rule of law and the protection of fundamental human rights — whether they are preserved, restricted, or completely suppressed by the authorities. This range of issues is examined in T. G. Morshchakova’s book, leitmotif of which is the presumption of the existence of an independent judge — the definition of a set of social, legal, and organizational principles that determine the authentic content of legal proceedings and guarantee the legal nature of the state’s political decisions. This topic is explored based on the author’s extensive experience in formulating the positions of the Constitutional Court of Russia in resolving the most pressing political cases during the early days of Russian constitutional justice. The focus is on the fine line between law and politics, the crossing of which threatens to rob the court of its true independence and turn it into a tool for legitimizing political decisions. The question remains: where does this line actually lie, and to what extent is it understood by modern judges?
About the author: Andrey Medushevsky – Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Tenured Professor, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Medushevskiy A. (2026) Vopros voprosov: mozhet li sud'ya byt' nezavisim? Razmyshleniya o knige: Morshchakova T. G. Sud'ya vne zavisimosti. M.: Fond «Prezidentskiy tsentr B. N. El'tsina», 2025 [The question of questions: can a judge be independent? Reflections on the book: Morshchakova T. G. A Judge Beyond Dependence. Moscow: Boris Yeltsin Presidential Center Foundation, 2025]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 53–77. (In Russian).
References
(2005) Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii [The Constitution of the Russian Federation in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Russia], Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoy politiki. (In Russian).
Abrosimova E.B. (2009) Ocherki rossiyskogo sudoustroystva: reformy i rezul'taty [An overview of the Russian judicial system: reforms and outcomes], Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoy politiki. (In Russian).
Ivanov L.O. (ed.) (2017) Konstitutsiya v postanovleniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii (1992–2016) [The Constitution in the rulings of the Constitutional Court of Russia (1992–2016)], Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoy politiki. (In Russian).
Koni A.F. (1914) Ottsy i deti sudebnoy reformy: (k pyatidesyatiletiyu sudebnykh ustavov): 1864 — 20 noyabrya — 1914 [The fathers and sons of judicial reform: (on the fiftieth anniversary of the judicial statutes): 1864 — November 20th — 1914], Moscow: Izdanie tovarishchestva I.D.Sytina. (In Russian).
Kononov A. (2017) Osoboe mnenie sud'i Kononova [Dissenting opinion of judge Kononov], Moscow: Kuchkovo pole. (In Russian).
Kuznetsova I. (2026) Garantii nezavisimosti sudey konstitutsionnykh sudov: tendentsii v Rossii i Central'noy Azii [Guarantees of constitutional court judges independence: recent trends in Russia and Central Asia]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.35, no.1, pp.30–52. (In Russian).
Medushevsky A.N. (2017) Politicheskaya istoriya russkoy revolyutsii: normy, instituty, formy sotsial'noy mobilizatsii v XX veke [The political history of the Russian Revolution: norms, institutions, and forms of social mobilization in the 20th century], Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ. (In Russian).
Medushevsky A.N. (ed.) (2022) Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossii: osmyslenie opyta [Russia’s Constitutional Court: rethinking its experience], Moscow: Tsentr konstitutsionnykh issledovaniy. (In Russian).
Medushevsky A.N. (ed.) (2025) Konstitutsiya Rossii posle reform 2020 goda: problemnyy kommentariy [The Constitution of Russia after the 2020 reform: legal and political commentary], Moscow: Tsentr konstitutsionnykh issledovaniy.
Morshchakova T.G. (1969) Chrezvychaynoe regulirovanie v oblasti sudoustroystva i sudoproizvodstva [Emergency regulations in the field of judicial organization and proceedings]. In: Chkhikvadze V.M. (ed.) Chrezvychaynoe zakonodatel'stvo FRG [Emergency legislation in Germany], Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, pp.192–229. (In Russian).
Morshchakova T.G. (1975) Psikhologicheskie istoki sudebnykh oshibok i vnutrennee ubezhdenie sudey [The psychological roots of judicial errors and judges’ personal convictions]. In: Kudryavtsev V.N. (ed.) Effektivnost' pravosudiya i problema ustraneniya sudebnykh oshibok [The effectiveness of justice and the challenge of correcting judicial errors], Moscow: Institut gosudarstva i prava Akademii nauk SSSR. (In Russian).
Morshchakova T.G. (2004) Rossiyskoe pravosudie v kontekste sudebnoy reformy [Russian justice in the context of judicial reform], Moscow: R.Valent. (In Russian).
Morshchakova T. (2005) Kontrreforma: ugroza i real'nost' [Counterreform: threat and reality]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.14, no.3, pp.61–68. (In Russian).
Morshchakova T.G. (2010) Sudebnoe pravoprimenenie v Rossii: o dolzhnom i real'nom [Judicial application of law in Russia: the ideal versus the reality], Moscow: R.Valent. (In Russian).
Morshchakova T.G. (2012) Predislovie [Foreword]. In: Morshchakova T.G. (ed.) Standarty spravedlivogo pravosudiya (mezhdunarodnye i natsional'nye praktiki) [Standards of fair justice (international and national practices)], Moscow: Mysl', pp.11–21. (In Russian).
Nußberger A. (2026) Judicial independence as a foundation of a state based on rule of law. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.35, no.1, pp.18–29.
Petrukhin I.L. (ed.) (2003) Sudebnaya vlast' [Judicial power], Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).
Soboleva A.K. (2013) Printsip razdeleniya vlastey [The principle of separation of powers]. In: Medushevsky A.N. (ed.) Osnovy konstitutsionnogo stroya Rossii: dvadtsat' let razvitiya [The foundations of Russia’s constitutional system: twenty years of development], Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoy politiki, pp.78–122. (In Russian).
Solomon P.H., Jr. (2005) Ugroza sudebnoy kontrreformy v Rossii [Threats of judicial counterreform in Putin’s Russia]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.14, no.3, pp.61–68. (In Russian).
Topornin B.N., Petrukhin I.L. (eds.) (2001) Sudebnaya reforma: problemy i perspektivy [Judicial reform: challenges and prospects], Moscow: Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN. (In Russian).
Yaroslavtsev V.G. (2007) Nravstvennoe pravosudie i sudeyskoe pravotvorchestvo [Moral justice and judicial lawmaking], Moscow: Yustitsinform. (In Russian).