Available in Russian
Author: Anita Soboleva
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2024-3-69-96
Keywords: on campus speech; deplatform movement; speech in universities; academic speech in the common law countries; hate speech in universities; discriminatory statements
The problems of public activity of students and university staff expressing political, moral, religious, and other views on university campuses was discussed in academic literature and been the subject of a number of judicial cases in national courts long before the Israel-Palestinian conflict gave rise to mass protest actions at universities in the USA, Europe, and Asia. In the UK, complaints brought by right-wing professors and students mainly dealt with the deplatforming of invited professors with conservative, nationalist, or ultra-left views or of religious bigots. The mass wave of pro-Palestinian actions raised concerns about the possibility of sanctions against students who called for violent actions, occupied buildings, interfered with the teaching process or official ceremonies, or sent offensive e-mails to those who dared to dissent. The US, UK, Malaysia and India have been selected for analysis because of the difference in their legal cultures and approaches to regulation of speech. The new challenges spurred legal scholars and politicians to think again about the flaws and benefits of laisser-faire doctrine for free speech and of over-broadness of speech regulation and their opposite — excessive regulation of freedom of speech. The article analyzes the role of codes of conduct for students and professors as well as universities’ freedom to regulate the content of courses and reading lists, introduce or discontinue academic programs, agree or disagree with invitations to visiting lecturers with unpopular or even non-scientific views, and discipline those who violate university standards. It concludes that the search for balance involves difficult choices in response to the need for finding a fair response to calls for violence, discrimination, and dissemination of threats, in order to create a more safe university environment, one where students and staff of different ethnic origins, nationalities, and religions may benefit from the opportunities which the university offers for education and free development of personality. Different legal cultures propose different answers to the same questions.
About the author: Anita Soboleva – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Philology, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Soboleva A. (2024) Speech on campus: pravovoe regulirovanie svobody vyrazheniya mneniya na territorii universitetov v stranakh obshchego prava [Speech on campus: legal regulation of free speech in universities in common law countries]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.33, no.3, pp.69–96. (In Russian).
References
(2023) Transcript of Arif Ahmed’s Speech at King’s College London. Office for Students, 10 October. URL: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/news-blog-and-events/press-and-media/transcript-of-arif-ahmeds-speech-at-kings-college-london/ (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Adams R. (2023) Students Can Make Provocative Remarks If They Do Not Break Law, Watchdog Says. The Guardian, 14 December. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/dec/14/students-can-make-provocative-remarks-if-they-do-not-break-law-watchdog-says (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Baine K.T. (2023) Free Speech on Campus: The Attack from Within. Hofstra Law Review, vol.51, no.2, pp.397–418.
Baker C.E. (1978) Scope of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech. UCLA Law Review, vol.25, pp.964–1040.
Blishchenko I.P. (1999) Problema ogranicheniya akademicheskikh svobod [The problem of limiting academic freedom]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.4, pp.3–14. (In Russian).
Carrillo S. (2023) After a Disastrous Testimony, Three College Presidents Face Calls to Resign. NPR, 8 December. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2023/12/08/1218314691/after-a-disastrous-testimony-three-college-presidents-face-calls-to-resign (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Chemerinsky E., Ben-Porath S. (2024) On Campus Free Speech: Is It a Goal in and of Itself, or a Tool Toward Other Goals That Universities Are Supposed to Nurture? A Debate. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, no.72. Available at: https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/72/on-campus-free-speech/ (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Chemerinsky E., Gillman H. (2017) Free Speech on Campus, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Corbett A. (2021) Moral Panics About Free Speech: How Should European Universities Respond? LSE Blogs, 23 February. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2021/02/23/moral-panics-about-free-speech-how-should-european-universities-respond/ (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Dickinson J. (2024) There’s a Chilling Effect on Campus That Few Dare Talk Of. Wonkhe, 22 May. Available at: https://wonkhe.com/wonk-corner/theres-a-chilling-effect-on-campus-that-few-dare-talk-of/ (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Gayle D. (2024) UK Police Arrest Two Pro-Palestine Activists Under Organised Crime Laws. The Guardian, 6 August. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/06/uk-police-arrest-two-pro-palestine-activists-under-organised-laws (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Gilley B. (2018) The Case for Colonialism. Academic Questions, vol.31, no.2, pp.1–19.
Gilley В. (2023) The Case of Colonialism, London: New English Review Press.
Gonzalez G., Coward T. (2023) Department of Education’s Newest “Dear Colleague” Letter Relies on Unconstitutional Standards, But Offers Some Promise. Fire, 10 November. Available at: https://www.thefire.org/news/department-educations-newest-dear-colleague-letter-relies-unconstitutional-standards-offers (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Hall R., Gohil N. (2024) Students Stage Pro-Palestine Occupations at Five More UK Universities. The Guardian, 6 May. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/06/students-stage-pro-palestine-occupations-at-five-more-uk-universities (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Ingber S. (1984) The Marketplace of Ideas: A Legitimizing Myth. Duke Law Journal, no.1, pp.1–91.
Lai A. (2023) In Defense of Free Speech in Universities: A Study of Three Jurisdictions, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lindsey G. (1986) No Platform: Free Speech for All? Socialist Worker Review, no.86, pp.11–12.
Loh B.Y.H. (2024) Platforming and Free Speech: Academia Caught Off Guard in Malaysia. Fulcrum, 14 May. Available at: https://fulcrum.sg/platforming-and-free-speech-academia-caught-off-guard-in-malaysia/ (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Mill J.S. (1861) O svobode [On liberty], 2nd ed., Leipzig: V.Gergard. (In Russian).
Morrow A. (2023) How Harvard, Penn and MIT’s Presidents Made Such a Fatal Error in Their Free Speech Defense. CNN, 11 December. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/11/business/university-leaders-testimony-nightcap/index.html (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Niazi Sh. (2023) Uproar Over JNU Restrictions on Student Campus Activities. University World News: The Global Window of Higher Education, 14 December. Available at: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20231214130326960 (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Roshchin E.N., Potapova E.B. (2021) Byt' ne v svoey vole, ili O neobkhodimosti akademicheskoy avtonomii [Being not in one’s own will, or on the need for academic autonomy]. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya yurisprudentsiya, no.4, pp.47–58. (In Russian).
Schrecker E. (1994) The Age of McCarthyism: A Brief History with Documents, Boston, MA: Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press.
Schrecker E.(1994) Microform Reviews: McCarthy Era Blacklisting of School Teachers, College Professors, and Other Public Employees. The FBI Responsibilities Program File and the Dissemination of Information Policy File. The Journal of American History, vol.81, no.1, pp.360–361.
Smith E. (2020) No Platform: A History of Anti-Fascism, Universities and the Limits of Free Speech, Abingdon: Routledge.
Stone G.R. (1983) Content Regulation and the First Amendment. William & Mary Law Review, vol.25, pp.189–252.
Stone G.R. (1987) Content-Neutral Restrictions. University of Chicago Law Review, vol.54, no.1, pp.46–118.
Stone G.R., Seidman L.M., Sunstein C.R., Tushnet M.V. (1991) Constitutional Law, 2nd ed., Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
Sunstein C.R. (2023) Free Speech On Campus? Thirty-Seven Questions (and Almost As Many Answers). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4674320 (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Walker P. (2024) England’s “Free Speech Tsar” Named in Announcement to One Newspaper. The Guardian, 1 June. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/jun/01/government-free-speech-tsar-named-arif-ahmed (accessed: 27.08.2024).
Yastrebtseva A.V. (2010) Universitetskaya akademicheskaya svoboda [University academic freedom]. Filosofskie nauki, no.11, pp.130–142. (In Russian).
Zavaley A.I. (2011) Novyy smysl starykh ponyatiy: akademicheskaya svoboda i avtonomiya universiteta [New meaning of old concepts: academic freedom and university autonomy]. In: Gasparyan D.E. (ed.) Filosofiya svobody [Philosophy of freedom], Saint Petersburg; Moscow: Aleteyya, pp.271–282. (In Russian).