Available in Russian
Author: Nataliya Varlamova
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2025-3-160-179
Keywords: public authority; social authority; constitutionalism; societal constitutionalism; legal pluralism; legal institutionalism; social system; global constitutionalism
The concept of societal constitutionalism was a reaction to the serious transformations of power that took place during the 20th century, which called into question division of this power into private and public. The activities of powerful national and transnational corporations carried out today affect citizens and civil society as a whole no less than the actions of public authorities. Supporters of societal constitutionalism seek to set limits on such social power through the constitutionalization of various spheres of social relations (economics, ecology, culture, science, health care, etc.). The theoretical prerequisites of societal constitutionalism are represented by various areas of legal thought, the most significant among which are the concepts of the economic constitution, legal pluralism, legal institutionalism, N.Luhmann’s theory of social systems and functional differentiation, global constitutionalism. The ideas developed within their framework largely correspond to modern realities, when society appears as a multitude of self-reproducing and self-regulating social systems that reach a global level and are relatively independent of national states. Legal regulation in such a society is increasingly being implemented not on a territorial basis within the borders of national states, but by functional spheres, including by the participants in the relevant relations themselves. All these diverse, relatively autonomous legal orders must be subject to constitutionalization in order to limit the forms of power realized in them. What the societal constitutionalism means to do is to solve this problem. Proponents of societal constitutionalism define it as a theory of a “new legal pluralism” and constitutional pluralism. In the context of societal constitutionalism, legal pluralism acquires a dynamic character; it focuses not on rules and structures, but on actions, and is defined not as a set of conflicting social norms, but as a multitude of diverse communicative processes and legal discourses, where the official law of national states or international institutions does not have any superiority.
About the author: Nataliya Varlamova – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow of the Human Rights Department, Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Citation:
Varlamova N. (2025) Sotsietal'nyy konstitutsionalizm: sotsial'nye i teoreticheskie osnovaniya kontseptsii [Societal constitutionalism: social and theoretical foundations of the concept]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.34, no.3, pp.160–179. (In Russian).
References
Allott P. (2001) The Emerging Universal Legal System. International Law FORUM du droit international, vol.3, no.1, pp.12–17.
Bäckstrand K. (2016) Multi-Stakeholder Partnership for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness. European Environment, vol.16, no.5, pp.290–306.
Bochkarev S.V. (2021) Pravovoe regulirovanie i sotsiental'nyy konstitutsionalizm: sootnoshenie ponyatiy [Legal regulation and societal constitutionalism: the correlation of concepts]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, no.2, pp.8–17. (In Russian).
Bondar N.S. (2025) Ekonomicheskiy konstitutsionalizm: sudebnaya doktrina i praktika [Economic constitutionalism: judicial doctrine and practice], 2nd ed., Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M. (In Russian).
Boström M. (2006) Regulatory Credibility and Authority through Inclusiveness: Standardization Organizations in Case of Eco-Labelling. Organization, vol.13, no.3, pp.345–367.
Büthe T., Mattli W. (2011) New Global Rules. The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cutler A.C. (2018) The Judicialization of Private Transnational Power and Authority. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.25, no.1, pp.61–95.
Dobner P., Loughlin M. (2010) Introduction. In: Dobner P., Loughlin M. (eds.) The Twilight of Constitutionalism? New York: Oxford University Press, pp. xi–xvi.
Ehrlich E. (2011) Osnovopolozhenie sotsiologii prava [Fundamental principles of the sociology of law], M.V.Antonov (transl.), V.G.Grafskiy, Yu.I.Grevtsov (eds.), Saint Petersburg: OOO “Universitetskiy izdatel'skiy konsortsium”. (In Russian).
Von Gierke O. (1887) Die Genossenschaftstheorie und die deutsche Rechtsprechung, Berlin: Weidmann.
Goldmann M. (2018) Public and Private Authority in a Global Setting: The Example of Sovereign Debt Restructuring. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.25, no.1, pp.331–363.
Golia A., Jr., Teubner G. (2021) Societal Constitutionalism: Background, Theory, Debates. Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, vol.15, no.4, pp.357–411.
Gurvitch G.D. (2004) Filosofiya i sotsiologiya prava: Izbrannye sochineniya [Philosophy and sociology of law: Selected works], M.V.Antonov, L.V.Voronina (transl.), Saint Petersburg: Izdatel'skiy dom Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta; Izdatel'stvo yuridicheskogo fakul'teta Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Habermas J. (1986) Law as Medium and Law as Institution. In: Teubner G. (ed.) Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp.203–220.
Habermas J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, W.Rehg (transl.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halmai G. (2014) Perspectives of Global Constitutionalism. The Use of Foreign and International Law, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Hartmann E. (2018) Transnational Private Authority in the Sphere of Education. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.25, no.1, pp.217–232.
Hartmann E., Kjaer P.F. (2018) The Status of Authority in the Globalizing Economy: Beyond the Public/Private Distinction. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.25, no.1, pp.3–11.
Haufler V. (2001) A Public Role for the Private Sector. Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy, Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Haufler V. (2003) New Form of Governance: Certification Regimes as Social Regulations of the Global Market. In: Meidinger E., Elliott C., Oesten G. (eds.) Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification, Remagen-Oberwinter: Forstbuch, pp.237–247.
Hauriou M. (2013) Osnovy publichnogo prava [Principles of public law], Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russian).
King A.A., Lenox M.J. (2000) Industry Self-Regulation without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program. The Academy of Management Journal, vol.43, no.4, pp.698–716.
Kjaer P.F. (2018) From the Private to the Public to the Private? Historicizing the Evolution of Public and Private Authority. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.25, no.1, pp.13–36.
Kondurov V.E., Kraevskiy A.A. (2019) Pravovye instituty i normy: problema deystvitel'nosti i deystvennosti prava v yuridicheskom institutsionalizme [Legal institutions and norms: the problem of validity and efficacy of the law in legal institutionalism]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk/Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, no.6, pp.95–144. (In Russian).
Lang A.F., Jr., Wiener A. (eds.) (2023) Handbook on Global Constitutionalism, 2nd ed., Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Leander A. (2018) The Politics of Legal Arrangements: The “Duty of Care”, Justifying, Extending, and Perpetuating the Public-in-the-Private Forms of Protection. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.25, no.1, pp.265–289.
Luhmann N. (1993) Das Recht der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann N. (1995) Social Systems, J.Bednarz, Jr., D.Baecker (transl.), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
MacCormick N. (1992) Further Thoughts on Institutional Facts. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, vol.5, no.1, pp.3–15.
MacCormick N. (1998) Norms, Institutions, and Institutional Facts. Law and Philosophy, vol.17, no.3, pp.301–345.
MacCormick N. (2007) Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory, New York: Oxford University Press.
MacCormick N., Weinberger O. (1986) An Institutional Theory of Law. New Approaches to Legal Positivism, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Mele V., Schepers D. (2013) E Pluribus Unum? Legitimacy Issues and Multi-Stakeholder Codes of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, vol.118, no.3, pp.561–576.
Merry S.E. (1988) Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review, vol.22, no.5, pp.869–896.
Milewicz K. (2009) Emerging Patterns of Global Constitutionalization: Toward a Conceptual Framework. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.16, no.2, pp.413–436.
Moskvitin O.A., Naumova E.A. (2023) Samoregulirovanie reklamnoy otrasli: zarubezhnyy opyt, vozmozhnosti i predely ego ispol'zovaniya v Rossii [Self-regulation in advertising: foreign experience, opportunities and limits of its use in Russia]. Rossiyskoe konkurentnoe pravo i ekonomika, no.2, pp.40–49. (In Russian).
O’Rourke D. (2006) Multi-Stakeholder Regulation: Privatizing or Socializing Global Labor Standards? World Development, vol.34, no.5, pp.899–918.
Pattberg P. (2005) The Institutionalization of Private Governance: How Business and Nonprofit Organizations Agree on Transnational Rules. Governance, vol.18, no.4, pp.589–610.
Peters A. (2005) Global Constitutionalism Revisited. International Legal Theory, vol.11, pp.39–67.
Peters A. (2006) Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, vol.19, no.3, pp.579–610.
Peters A. (2009) Supremacy Lost: International Law Meets Domestic Constitutional Law. Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, vol.3, no.3, pp.170–198.
Peters A. (2009) The Merits of Global Constitutionalism. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.16, no.2, pp.397–411.
Peters A., Armingeon K. (2009) Introduction: Global Constitutionalism from an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.16, no.2, pp.385–395.
Picciotto S. (2008) Constitutionalizing Multilevel Governance? International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.6, no.3–4, pp.457–479.
Pigman G.A. (2007) The World Economic Forum: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach to Global Governance, Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
Rabault H. (2024) “Global Bukovina”: Gunther Teubner’s Homage to Eugen Ehrlich. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, vol.44, no.1, pp.48–66.
Di Robilant A. (2006) Genealogies of Soft Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol.54, no.3, pp.449–554.
Romano S. (2017) The Legal Order, M.Crose (ed.), London: Routledge.
Schwöbel C.E.J. (2011) Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective, Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Sciulli D. (1986) Voluntaristic Action as a Distinct Concept: Theoretical Foundations of Societal Constitutionalism. American Sociological Review, vol.51, no.6, pp.743–766.
Sciulli D. (1992) Theory of Societal Constitutionalism. Foundations of a Non-Marxist Critical Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sciulli D. (2001) Corporate Power in Civil Society. An Application of Societal Constitutionalism, New York; London: New York University Press.
Selznick P. (1969) Law, Society and Industrial Justice, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
De Sousa Santos B. (1987) Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law. Journal of Law and Society, vol.14, no.3, pp.279–302.
Spar D.L., La Mure L.T. (2003) The Power of Activism: Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global Business. California Management Review, vol.45, no.3, pp.78–101.
Stone Sweet A. (2009) Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, and International Regimes. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.16, no.2, pp.621–645.
Teubner G. (1992) The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism. Cardozo Law Review, vol.13, no.5, pp.1443–1462.
Teubner G. (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System, A.Bankowska, R.Adler (transl.), Z.Bankowski (ed.), Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Teubner G. (1997) Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society. In: Teubner G. (ed.) Global Law Without a State, Brookfield, NH: Dartmouth, pp.3–28.
Teubner G. (2012) Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, New York: Oxford University Press.
Teubner G. (2016) Kontury konstitutsionnoy sotsiologii: preodolenie isklyuchitel'nosti gosudarstvennogo konstitutsionalizma [The project of constitutional sociology: irritating nation state constitutionalism]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.15, no.1, pp.41–55. (In Russian).
Teubner G. (2017) Societal Constitutionalism: Nine Variations on a Theme by David Sciulli. In: Blokker P., Thornhill C. (eds.) Sociological Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.313–340.
Thornhill C. (2010) Niklas Luhmann and the Sociology of Constitution. Journal of Classical Sociology, vol.10, no.4, pp.315–337.
Thornhill C. (2011) A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trujillo E. (2018) Regulatory Cooperation in International Trade and Its Transformative Effects on Executive Power. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.25, no.1, pp.365–412.
Varlamova N.V. (2014) Problemy institutsionalizatsii nadnatsional'nogo urovnya osushсhestvleniya publichno-vlastnykh polnomochiy [Problems of institutionalization of the supranational level of implementation of public authorities]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, no.6, pp.8–34. (In Russian).
Varlamova N.V., Vasilieva T.A. (eds.) (2017) Internatsionalizatsiya konstitutsionnogo prava: sovremennye tendentsii [Internationalization of constitutional law: current trends], Moscow: Institut gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. (In Russian).
Weinberger O. (1991) Law, Institution and Legal Politics: Fundamental Problems of Legal Theory and Social Philosophy, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Weinberger O. (1998) Alternative Action Theory: Simultaneously a Critique of Georg Henrik von Wright’s Practical Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer.
Weinberger O. (1999) Legal Validity, Acceptance of Law, Legitimacy. Some Critical Comments and Constructive Proposals. Ratio Juris, vol.12, no.4, pp.336–353.
Weiner A., Lang A.F., Jr., Tully J., Maduro M.P., Kumm M. (2012) Global Constitutionalism: Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. Global Constitutionalism, vol.1, no.1, pp.1–15.