Available in Russian
Author: Tatiana Vasilieva
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2025-3-89-106
Keywords: climate change; constitution; climate constitutionalism; human rights; case law; rights-based climate litigation.
The United Nations Development Programme documents address climate change as an issue that determines human development for the present generation. Public concern about climate change is growing. This is evidenced by the increase in the number of climate assemblies in various countries of the world, convened on the initiative of both public authorities and non-governmental organizations. It is very significant that representatives of the younger generation are the ones that show interest in climate change issues. The term “climate constitutionalism” is widely used in the legal literature. It can be interpreted as a concept aimed at justifying the need to give constitutional status to relations connected with ensuring climate stability, or as a practice involving the use of constitutional principles, rights and procedures to counter climate change. And if the processes of constitutionalization are quite successful, their conceptual justification has not yet been properly developed. Climate change-related issues are being addressed in the drafting of amendments and new constitutions. The undisputed leaders in this field are the states of the Global South. Since 2005, there has been an increase in the number of climate litigation in the world, but the human rights dimension begins to be traced only in 2018. More and more judicial authorities are recognizing that government inactions or omissions regarding climate change can infringe on citizens’ constitutional rights. Separate attempts are being made to substantiate the actual climatic constitutional rights. The involvement of international human rights bodies in addressing climate change issues in context of the neglect of states’ human rights obligations is becoming more common. Rights-based climate litigation addresses global issues that cannot be resolved on a single country scale, so it is necessary to study positive practices, develop a global legal language and certain standards for dealing with climate cases, which can impact national constitutional systems.
About the author: Tatiana Vasilieva – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Associate Professor, Chief Research Fellow, Human Rights Department, Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Citation:
Vasilieva T. (2025) Problemy, svyazannye s izmeneniem klimata: sposoby konstitutsionnogo reagirovaniya [The climate change challenges: constitutional responses]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.34, no.3, pp.89–106. (In Russian).
References
Amirante D. (2022) Environmental Constitutionalism Through the Lens of Comparative Law: New Perspectives for the Anthropocene. In: Amirante D., Bagni S. (eds.) Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene. Values, Principles and Actions, Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp.148–167.
Auz J. (2022) Human Rights-Based Climate Litigation: A Latin American Cartography. Journal of Human Rights and Environment, vol.13, no.1, pp.114–136.
Averchenkova A., Smith G., Koehl A. (2025) Policy Impact of the French Citizens’ Convention for the Climate: Untangling the Fate of the Citizens’ Recommendations. Knowledge Network on Climate Assemblies, April. Available at: https://www.knoca.eu/briefings/policy-impact-of-the-french-citizens-convention-for-the-climate-untangling-the-fate-of-the-citizens-recommendations (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Bahamonde F. (2022) Climate Revolution in Chile: The World’s First Constitution after the Paris Agreement? Patagon Journal, 21 July. Available at: https://www.patagonjournal.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4410%3Arevolucion-climatica-en-chile-ila-primera-constitucion-del-mundo-posterior-al-acuerdo-de-paris&catid=165%3Auna-nueva-constitucion&Itemid=279&lang=en# (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Buono E. (2024) Costituzionalismo ambientale o costituzionalismo climatico? “Tra magia e inganno”. DPCE online, vol.65, no.3, pp.2019–2035.
Curato N., Smith G., Willis R. (2024) Deliberative Democracy and Climate Change: Exploring the Potential of Climate Assemblies in the Global South, Stockholm: Agence Française de Développement and International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Davis B., Hickey S.P. (2022) Constitutions: The Environment and Climate Change. In: Abebe A.K., Bisarya S., Bulmer W.E., Davies B., Hickey S.P., Noël T., Zulueta-Fülscher K. Annual Review of Constitution-Building: 2021, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, pp.26–45.
Dedov D.I., Gadzhiev Kh.I. (2024) Klimaticheskie prava i ikh sudebnaya zashchita: kommentariy k pravovym pozitsiyam Bol'shoy palaty Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Climate rights and their judicial protection: commentary on the legal positions of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights]. Zhurnal inostrannogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo prava, no.5, pp.61–73. (In Russian).
Ghaleigh N.S., Setzer J., Welikala A. (2022) The Complexities of Comparative Climate Constitutionalism. Journal of Environmental Law, vol.34, no.3, pp.517–528.
Huneeus A. (2022) Win or Lose, Chile’s Draft Constitution Heralds a New Era of Climate Constitutionalism. Verfassungsblog, 31 August. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/win-or-lose/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Jaria-Manzano J., Borràs S. (2019) Introduction to the Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism. In: Jaria-Manzano J., Borràs S. (eds.) Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism, Cheltelham; Northampton, MA: Edward Eldar Publishing, pp.1–16.
Kaufmann R. (2023) The Chilean Constituent Process: Take 2. Verfassungsblog, 3 February. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/the-chilean-constituent-process-take-2/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Kaufmann R. (2023) Third Time’s A Charm: Chile’s Second Constituent Process. Verfassungsblog, 11 December. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/third-times-a-charm/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Keller H., Heri C. (2022) The Future is Now: Climate Cases Before the ECtHR. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, vol.40, no.1, pp.153–174.
Knox J.H., Voigt C. (2020) Introduction to the Symposium on Jacqueline Peel & Jolene Lin, “Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South”. American Journal of International Law Unbound, vol.114, pp.35–39.
Limon M. (2009) Human Rights and Climate Change: Constructing a Case for Political Action. Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol.33, no.2, pp.439–476.
Lopez Moreno R. (2025) Constitutionally Mobilizing against Climate Change: The Case of Environmental Movement at the Chilean Constitutional Convention. Law & Society Review, vol.59, no.1, pp.106–137.
May J.R., Daly E. (2018) Constitutionalism and Climate Justice. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3252650 (accessed: 18.08.2025).
May J.R., Daly E. (2019) Global Climate Constitutionalism and Justice in the Courts. In: Jaria-Manzano J., Borràs S. (eds.) Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism, Cheltelham; Northampton, MA: Edward Eldar Publishing, pp.235–245.
Müller J. (2024) Constitutional Innovations in Environmental and Climate Action: Rights, Litigation and Statehood Redefined. In: Abebe A.K., Bisarya S., Bulmer W.E., Hickey S.P., Müller J., Zulueta-Fülscher K. Annual Review of Constitution-Building: 2023, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, pp.66–88.
Noël T. (2021) Attempting Constitutional Amendment in France: Greening the Constitution or Surfing the Green Wave? In: Abebe A., Dziedzic A., Welikala A., Houlihan E.C., Grogan J., Zulueta-Fülscher K., Noël T., Al-Ali Z. Annual Review of Constitution-Building: 2020, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, pp.88–103.
Petrillo P.L. (2023) Il costituzionalismo climatico. Note introduttive. DPCE online, vol.58, no.2, pp.233–250.
Pfeffer J. (2024) Setting the Agenda for Climate Assemblies. Trade-Offs and Guiding Principles. Climate Policy, vol.24, no.6, pp.843–858.
Sandover R., Mosley A., Devine-Wright P. (2021) Contrasting Views of Citizens’ Assemblies: Stakeholder Perceptions of Public Deliberation on Climate Change. Politics and Governance, vol.9, no.2, pp.76–86.
Savaresi A., Setzer J. (2022) Rights-Based Litigation in the Climate Emergency: Mapping the Landscape and New Knowledge Frontiers. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, vol.13, no.1, pp.7–34.
Setzer J., Benjamin L. (2020) Climate Change Litigation in the Global South: Filing in Gaps. American Journal of International Law Unbound, vol.114, pp.56–60.
Setzer J., Borges C., Leal G. (2020) Public Prosecutors, Political Parties and NGOs Are Paving the Way for Vital Climate Change Litigation in Brazil. The London School of Economics and Political Science, 25 November. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/public-prosecutors-political-parties-and-ngos-are-paving-the-way-for-vital-climate-change-litigation-in-brazil/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Setzer J., Carvalho D. (2021) IEA v. Brazil: Rights-Based Climate Litigation to Protect the Brazilian Amazon. Oxford Human Rights Hub, 8 April. Available at: https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/iea-v-brazil-rights-based-climate-litigation-to-protect-the-brazilian-amazon-2/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Setzer J., Higham C. (2024) Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2024 Snapshot. Policy report. June. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2024-snapshot.pdf (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Setzer J., Higham C. (2025) Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2025 Snapshot. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2025-snapshot/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Setzer J., Winter de Carvalho D. (2021) Climate Litigation to Protect the Brazilian Amazon: Establishing a Constitutional Right to Stable Climate. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, vol.30, no.2, pp.197–206.
Solntsev A.M., Otrashevskaya A.M. (2024) Sovremennaya praktika mezhdunaronykh sudov v sfere razresheniya klimaticheskikh sporov [Current practice of international courts in the field of climate dispute resolution]. Zhurnal inostrannogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo prava, no.6, pp.89–97. (In Russian).
Tigre M.A., Barry M. (2025) Climate Change in the Courts: A 2024 Retrospective. Columbia Law School. Columbia Climate School. Sabine Center for Climate Change Law, 21 January. Available at: https://climate.law.columbia.edu/content/climate-change-courts-2024-retrospective (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Tigre M.A., Samuel S.A. (2025) Africa’s Advisory Opinion Request: Taking Climate Justice to the Continent’s Highest Court. Climate Law. A Sabin Center blog, 7 May. Available at: https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2025/05/07/africas-advisory-opinion-request-taking-climate-justice-to-the-continents-highest-court/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Toral K.M., Higham C., Setzer J., Ghaleigh N.S., Welikala A., Arena C. (2021) The 11 Nations Heralding a New Dawn of Climate Constitutionalism. The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2 December. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/the-11-nations-heralding-a-new-dawn-of-climate-constitutionalism/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Viñas M.H., Ragone S. (2024) Si chiude un ciclo costituente in Cile. Diritti comparati, 15 gennaio. Available at: https://www.diritticomparati.it/si-chiude-un-ciclo-costituente-in-cile/ (accessed: 18.08.2025).
Wegener B. (2024) Globuli für Umweltjuristen: Gedanken zur Klimaklagen-Bewegung anlässlich des Klimaseniorinnen-Urteils des EGMR. Verfassungblog, 11 April. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/globuli-fur-umweltjuristen (accessed: 18.08.2025).