
Available in Russian
Author: Alexey Nechaev
DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2017-3-134-147
Keywords: interpretation; административная наказанность; административная преюдиция; дело Дадина; итоговое решение по делу; общественная опасность деяния; проверка конституционности
This article considers the judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in Dadin. The author presents an organizational and legal basis for a new type of decision that the Constitutional Court could pass based on the outcome of a case on the verification of the constitutionality of an enactment. The article highlights problems concerning the choice of this type of decision in Dadin. That the Court’s interpretation did not decriminalize the act prohibited by Article 2121 of the Russian Criminal Code is a justified conclusion: firstly, decisions of the Court cannot be considered as acts of law enforcement, and secondly, when the Court rules that a criminal statute is unconstitutional, this does not automatically result in the statute being removed from the Criminal Code. The author focuses special attention on the Court’s conclusion that corpus delicti under Article 2121 is material. The article shows that the arguments underlying the Court’s decision contradict not only each other, but also widely recognized provisions of criminal law doctrines. The Court’s judgment does not provide a proper analysis of the prevalence of the criminalized act, thereby excluding any evaluation of the criminal degree of social danger. This interpretation arises following problems with the practice of incrimination: firstly, from the subjective side of the crime, the interpretation does not clearly define the type of culpability required (intent or carelessness) and, secondly, from the objective side of crime, the interpretation does not resolve issues regarding the relationship between Article 2121 and other articles of the Criminal Code (accumulation of crimes or competition of criminal law norms).
About the author: Alexey Nechaev – Researcher, Academy of the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Nechaev A. (2017) Konstitutsionnost’ polozheniy normativnogo akta v istolkovanii Konstitutsionnogo Suda: osnovaniya i argumentatsiya (na primere dela Dadina) [The constitutionality of the provisions of a normative act in the interpretation of the Constitutional Court of Russia: approaches and arguments based on Dadin]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.3, pp.134–147. (In Russian).
References
Baulin Yu.V. (2005) Pravonarusheniya v sfere publichnogo i chastnogo prava [Public law offences and torts under civil law]. In: Komissarov V.S. (ed.) Sootnoshenie prestupleniy i inykh pravonarusheniy[Collation of crimes and other offences], Moscow: LeksEst, pp.41–43. (In Russian).
Bobrova T.M. (2015) Organizatsionno-pravovaya forma osushchestvleniya konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: stanovlenie, razvitie i problemy sovershenstvovaniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The legal form of constitutional justice in the Russian Federation: Formation, development and problems of improvement: abstract of a thesis for a candidate in legal sciences (Ph.D.)], Moscow. (In Russian).
Bondar’ N.S. (2007) Normativno-doktrinal’naya priroda resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF kak istochnikov prava [Normative and doctrinal nature of decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as sources of law]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no.4, pp.75–85. (In Russian).
Bondar’ N.S. (2014) Aksiologiya sudebnogo konstitutsionalizma: konstitutsionnye tsennosti v teorii i praktike konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya [Axiology of judicial constitutionalism: constitutional values in the theory and practice of constitutional law], 2nd ed., Moscow: Yurist. (In Russian).
Demidov Yu.A. (1975) Sotsial’naya tsennost’ i otsenka v ugolovnom prave [Social value and valuation in the criminal law], Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russian).
Durmanov N.D. (1948) Ponyatie prestupleniya [The Definition of Crime], Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR. (In Russian).
Fefilova V.F. (1975) O kriterii razgranicheniya prestupleniy i prostupkov po sovetskomu pravu [On the criteria for distinguishing crimes and offenses under Soviet law]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, no.4, pp.77–83. (In Russian).
Filimonov V.D. (1981) Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava [Criminological grounds of criminal law], Tomsk: Izdatel'stvo Tomskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Filimonova M.V. (2014) Predely deystviya postanovleniy KS RF kak germenevticheskikh aktov norm grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava [Scope of the Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as hermeneutical acts of civil procedural law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, no.6, pp.56–70. (In Russian).
Khavronyuk N.I. (2004) Povody, prichiny, usloviya i sposoby kriminalizatsii obshchestvenno opasnykh deyaniy [Reasons, causes, conditions and ways of criminalizing socially dangerous actions]. In: Rarog A.I. (ed.) Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke [Criminal law: Developmental strategy in the 20th century], Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MGYuA, pp.447–453. (In Russian).
Kleymenov M.P. (2016) Administrativnoe i ugolovnoe pravonarushenie [Administrative and criminal misdemeanors]. In: Dolgova A.I. (ed.) Prestupnost’, ugolovnaya politika, zakon [Criminality, criminal policy, and law], Moscow: Rossiyskaya kriminologicheskaya assotsiatsiya, pp.186–192. (In Russian).
Korobeev A.I. (1982) Kriminalizatsiya i penalizatsiya neostorozhnykh deyaniy v sfere ispol'zovaniya tekhniki [Criminalization and penalization of carelessness in the sphere of technologies]. In: Kudryavtsev V.N. (ed.) XXVI s'ezd KPSS i ukreplenie zakonnosti i pravoporyadka [XXVI Congress of the CPSU and the strengthening of law and order], Moscow: Izdatel'stvo IGiP AN SSSR, pp.37–44. (In Russian).
Korobeev A.I. (1987) Sovetskaya ugolovno-pravovaya politika: problemy kriminalizatsii i penalizatsii[Soviet criminal law Policy: Problems of criminalization and penalization], Vladivostok: Izdatel'stvo Dal'nevostochnogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Kryazhkova O. (2016) Tolkovanie KS – povod k peresmotru dela [Interpretation of the Constitutional Court as reason for reviewing a case]. Legal.Report, 28 November. Available at: https://legal.report/author-19/tolkovanie-ks-povod-k-peresmotru-dela/tolkovanie-ks-povod-k-peresmotru-dela (accessed: 15.02.2017).
Kryazhkova O., Rudt Yu. (2015) Rasstanovka mest slagaemykh v resheniyakh konstitutsionnykh sudov: pochemu summa menyaetsya? [Changing the order of items in a Constitutional Court's Judgments: Why does it change the sum?]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.5, pp.120–135. (In Russian).
Kudryavtsev V.N., Yakovlev A.M. (eds.) (1982) Osnovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta. Kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya [Foundations of the criminal law preventing power. Criminalization and decriminalization], Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Kulapov V.L., Mal'ko A.V. (2008) Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law], Moscow: Norma. (In Russian).
Kuznetsova N.F. (1969) Prestuplenie i prestupnost' [Crime and criminality], Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Lopashenko N.A. (2009) Ugolovnaya politika [Criminal law policy], Moscow: Wolters Kluwer. (In Russian).
Lyapunov Yu.I. (1989) Obshchestvennaya opasnost' deyaniya kak universalnaya kategoriya sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava [The social danger of an act as a universal category in Soviet Criminal Law], Moscow: Izdatel'stvo VYuZSh MVD SSSR. (In Russian).
Mal'tsev V.V. (1980) Kriminalizatsiya povedeniya i obshchestvenno opasnye posledstviya [Criminalization of behavior and socially dangerous consequences]. In: Aktualnye problemy kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii obshchestvenno opasnykh deyaniy [Actual problems of criminalization and decriminalization of socially dangerous acts], Omsk: Izdatel'stvo Omskoу VShM MVD SSSR, pp.29–39. (In Russian).
Martsev A.I. (2000) Obshchie voprosy ucheniya o prestuplenii [General issues in the criminal doctrine], Omsk: Izdatel'stvo Omskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD SSSR. (In Russian).
Nomokonov V.A. (2013) “Kriminalizatsiya” administrativnogo prava ili administrativnyy proizvol kriminalizatsii [The “Criminalization” of administrative law or the administrative arbitrariness of criminalization?]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, no.2, pp.208–213. (In Russian).
Nomokonov V.A. (2016) O kriminologicheskoy neobosnovannosti rossiyskoy ugolovnoy politiki [On the criminological hollowness of Russian criminal policy]. In: Komissarov V.S. (ed.) Kriminologicheskie osnovy ugolovnogo prava [Criminological fundamentals of the criminal law], Moscow: Yurlitinform, pp.196–200. (In Russian).
Obrazhiev K.V. (2014) Sistema formal'nykh yuridicheskikh istochnikov rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [The system of formal legal sources in Russian criminal law: Dr. in law sci. thesis], Moscow. (In Russian).
Plaksina T.A. (2011) Kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya v sovremennom ugolovnom prave Rossii [Criminalization and decriminalization in contemporary Russian Criminal Law]. In: Anichkin E.S., Muzyukin V.Ya. (eds.) Rossiyskoe gosudarstvo i pravo: traditsii, sovremennost', budushchee [The Russian state and law: Past, present, and future], Barnaul: Izdatel'stvo Altayskogo universiteta, pp.175–180. (In Russian).
Prozumentov L.M. (2009) Obshchestvennaya opasnost' kak osnovanie kriminalizatsii/dekriminalizatsii deyaniya [Social danger as a reason for the criminalization or decriminalization of an act]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii, no.4, pp.18–24. (In Russian).
Pudovochkin Yu.E. (2008) Uchenie o prestuplenii: izbrannye lektsii [Doctrine of the crime: Selected lectures], Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russian).
Radoshnova N.V. (2015) Kriminalizatsiya (dekriminalizatsiya) v ugolovnom prave Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Criminalization (decriminalization) in Russian criminal law: abstract of a thesis for a candidate in legal sciences (Ph.D.)], Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).
Samoshchenko I.S. (1963) Ponyatie pravonarusheniya po sovetskomu zakonodatel'stvu [The Definition of Offence under Soviet Legislation], Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russian).
Taeva N.E. (2014) Nekotorye problemy vyyavleniya konstitutsionno-pravovogo smysla norm Konstitutsionnym Sudom RF [Problems with identifying the constitutional and legal substance of norms of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, no.12, pp.24–28. (In Russian).
Tobolkin P.S. (1983) Sotsial'naya obuslovlennost’ ugolovno-pravovykh norm [Social conditionality of the criminal law], Sverdlovsk: Sredne-Ural'skoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo. (In Russian).
Veselov E. (2004) Granitsa prestupnogo i neprestupnogo [Delimitation of the criminal and the non-criminal]. Ugolovnoe pravo, no.3, pp.12–14. (In Russian).
Yakovlev A.M. (1982) Kriminalizatsiya deyaniy v sisteme sotsialnogo kontrolya i sotsialnogo planirovaniya [Criminalization of Acts in the System of Social Control and Social Planning]. In: Kogan V.M., Kelina S.G., Yakovlev A.M. (eds.) Planirovanie mer bor'by s prestupnost'yu [Planning the measures for struggling against criminality], Moscow: Izdatel'stvo IGiP AN SSSR, pp.31–38. (In Russian).
Zagorodnikov N.I. (1979) Sovetskaya ugolovnaya politika i deyatel’nost’ organov vnutrennikh del [Soviet criminal policy and the institutions of internal affairs], Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MVD SSSR. (In Russian).
Zlobin G.A., Kelina S.G., Yakovlev A.M. (1977) Sovetskaya ugolovnaya politika: differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti [Soviet criminal law policy: Differentiation of responsibilities]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.9, pp.54–62. (In Russian).
Zykov D.A., Shesler A.V. (2013) Ponyatie, osnovaniya i printsipy kriminalizatsii i dekriminalizatsii deyaniy [The definition, reasons and principles for criminalization and decriminalization]. Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridischeskogo instituta, no.1, pp.85–90. (In Russian).