On сonstitutionalization of private law

Available in Russian

Available for free

Author: Alim Ulbashev

DOI: 10.21128/1812-7126-2017-6-87-100

Keywords: human rights; «хозяйственное право»; дуализм частного права; конституционализация частного права; личные права; система права; судебное толкование

Abstract

The article presents critical analysis of the phenomenon of constitutionalization of private law in Russia and foreign jurisdictions. At the same time the author anticipates his research with a brief overview of development of Russian legislation in post-revolutionary Soviet time. Special attention is paid to political and ideological attacks on private law and the artificial allocation of so-called “economic law” (consequences of these processes for domestic jurisprudence are analyzed as well). This review is necessary for understanding the problems of implementing the doctrine of constitutionalization of private law in modern Russia. The article consistently pursues the idea of inadmissibility of considering the constitutionalization of private law as a fusion of private and public law. On the contrary, the constitutionalization of private law should be understood as a process of mutual enrichment of these areas (branches) of law. This approach is most consistent with the approaches and practices formed by the developed, so-called “civilized” jurisdictions (mainly Germany). The principle of the primacy of human rights should remain the initial value for both constitutional and private law, and therefore for the process of constitutionalization of private law.

About the author: Alim Ulbashev – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Visiting Researcher (2017/2018), Yale University, New Haven, USA.

Citation: Ulbashev A.Kh. (2017) O konstitutsionalizatsii chastnogo prava [On constitutionalization of private law] Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.6, pp.87–100. (In Russian).

References

Agarkov M.M. (1940) Predmet i sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava [The subject and system of Soviet civil law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.8–9, pp.52–72. (In Russian).

Arzhanov M.A. (1940) Predmet i metod pravovogo regulirovaniya v svyazi s voprosom o sisteme sovetskogo prava [The subject and legal method in correlation with the issues of the system of Soviet law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.8–9, pp.12–28. (In Russian).

Barak A. (2012) Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barak A. (2015) Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bratus' S.N. (1963) Predmet i sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava [The subject and system of Soviet civil law], Moscow: Gosyurizdat. (In Russian).

Cremer H.-J. (2010) Human Rights and the Protection of Privacy in Tort Law: A Comparison between English and German Law, New York: Routledge.

Dembo L.I. (1950) Kolkhoznoe pravootnoshenie i sistema sovetskogo prava [Kolkhoz legal relationship and the system of Soviet law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.7, pp.43–58. (In Russian).

Gadzhiev G.A. (ed.) (2010) Konstitutsionnaya ekonomika [Constitutional economics], Moscow: Yustitsinform. (In Russian).

Genkin D.M. (1940) Predmet i sistema sovetskogo trudovogo prava [The subject and system of Soviet labor law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.2, pp.55–71. (In Russian).

Gintsburg L., Suvorov I. (ed.) (1933) Voprosy sovetskogo hozyaystvennogo prava [The problems of Soviet economic law], Moscow: Sovetskoe za­konodatel'stvo. (In Russian).

Haase M. (2004) Grundnorm – Gemeinwille – Geist: Der Grund des Rechts nach Kelsen, Kant und Hegel[Basic norm – Common will – Spirit], Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Hoffman D. (ed.) (2011) The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Medvedev D.A. (ed.) (2008) Kodifikatsiya rossiyskogo chastnogo prava [Codification of Russian private law], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Nieuwenhuis H. (2006) Fundamental Rights Talk. An Enrichment of Legal Discourse in Private Law. In: Barkhuysen T., Lindenbergh S.D. (eds.) Constitutionalisation of Private Law, Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp.1–8.

Novitskaya T.E. (2011) Grazhdanskiy kodeks RSFSR 1922 goda [The Civil Code of the RSFSR of 1922], Moscow: Zertsalo-M. (In Russian).

Remenson A.L. (1963) K voprosu o meste sovetskogo ispravitel'no-trudovogo prava v sisteme sovetskogo prava [On place of Soviet petitionary law in the system of Soviet law]. Trudy Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni V.V.Kuybysheva: Voprosy ekonomiki i prava, vol.162, pp.121–132. (In Russian).

Rovinskiy E.A. (1940) Predmet sovetskogo finansovogo prava [The subject of Soviet financial law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.3, pp.29–48. (In Russian).

Savage D.G. (2014) In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court Got it Right – Then and Now. Georgia Law Review, vol.48, no.3, pp.865–871.

Shargorodskiy M.D. (1941) Predmet i sistema ugolovnogo prava [The subject and system of Soviet criminal law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.4, pp.38–51. (In Russian).

Smits J. (2006) Private Law and Fundamental Rights: a Skeptical View. In: Barkhuysen T., Lindenbergh S.D. (eds.) Constitutionalisation of Private Law, Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp.9–22.

Studenikin S.S. (1939) O predmete i sisteme sovetskogo administrativnogo prava [On the subject and system of Soviet administrative law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.3, pp.102–110. (In Russian).

Sukhanov E.A. (ed.) (2014) Rossiyskoe grazhdanskoe pravo [Russian civil law], in 2 vols., Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Troitskiy I.I. (1930) Trudovoe pravo – sovetskoe pravo [Labor law is Soviet law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i revolyutsiya prava, no.1, pp.117–122. (In Russian).

Tushnet M. (2014) New York Times v. Sullivan Around the World. Alabama Law Review, vol.66, no.2, pp.337–356.

Voermas W. (2006) Applicability of Fundamental Rights in Private Law: What Is the Legislature to do? An Intermezzo from a Constitutional Point of View. In: Barkhuysen T., Lindenbergh S.D. (eds.) Constitutionalisation of Private Law, Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp.33–42.

Vyshinskiy A.Ya. (1938) Osnovnye zadachi nauki sovetskogo sotsialisticheskogo prava: Sokrashchyonnaya stenogramma doklada na 1-m soveshchanii po voprosam nauki sovetskogo prava i gosudarstva 16 iyulya 1938 g. [The main problems of Soviet socialist legal doctrine: A shorter transcript of the report at the 1st conference on the Soviet socialist law and state theory. July 16, 1938]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost', no.8, pp.1–34. (In Russian).

Wasserman H.M. (2013) A Jurisdictional Perspective on New York Times v. Sullivan. Northwestern University Law Review, vol.107, no.2, pp.901–914.

Wilkinson M.A. (2013) Political Constitutionalism and the European Union. The Modern Law Review, vol.76, no.2, pp.191–222.

Zor'kin V.D. Konstitutsionnyy Sud i razvitie grazhdanskogo prava [The Constitutional Court and development of civil law]. Available at: http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/News/Speech/Pages/ViewItem.aspx?ParamId=48 (accessed: 05.11.2017). (In Russian).